Doctor not essential to run basic pathology labs: Health Ministry directs implementation
Advertisement
"For basic composite laboratory, wherever the interpretation of the medical report is required, the same is to be signed by a qualified registered medical practitioner having minimum MBBS degree and the reports which contain only numerical value/result of the test/technical analysis of samples, then signing of the report by MBBS doctors may not be essential."
New Delhi: Doctors would no longer be a necessary component for running a basic pathology laboratory in the country. While a provision for such a policy was recently made in the Minimum Standards for Medical Diagnostic laboratories under the Clinical Establishments Act. 2010, a confirmation to the same comes in the form of a recent letter from the Director NHM, Ministry of Health directing all the states to implement the said provisions.
The letter which was recently written by the Additional Secretary, Ministry of Health And Family Welfare as well as the Mission Director, National Health Mission to the Principal Secretaries, Health in all states and UTs clarifies the stand of the government in the light of implementation of Supreme Court order in the matter of North Gujarat unit of association of self-employed owners (paramedical) of private pathology laboratories of Gujarat versus North Gujarat pathologists association regarding the signing of the Laboratory reports.
The letter refers to the Gazette Notification that has been published by Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India in respect of Minimum Standards for Medical Diagnostic laboratories under Clinical Establishments Act. 2010. In light the SC order, the letter clarifies the following
"States may like to implement the above as appropriate," the letter added
Medical Dialogues team had earlier reported that the central government's Gazette notification on path lab rules had indeed become a bone of contention between the medical professionals and the government. As per the new rules, for running small labs, the presence of doctors would not be mandatory, as the manpower requirement for authorized signatory being MCI recognized doctors in such labs has only been kept as desired, not essential
Alleging that this will allow small labs to be run by nondoctors, will finally promote more quackery in laboratory medicine and will lead to mushrooming of illegal labs in the country, doctors have pointed out that the new rules will eventually put the patient at risk and dilute of the overall quality of care in medical services.
Read Also: Doctor NOT essential to run Small path labs: Health ministry Gazette
New Delhi: Doctors would no longer be a necessary component for running a basic pathology laboratory in the country. While a provision for such a policy was recently made in the Minimum Standards for Medical Diagnostic laboratories under the Clinical Establishments Act. 2010, a confirmation to the same comes in the form of a recent letter from the Director NHM, Ministry of Health directing all the states to implement the said provisions.
The letter which was recently written by the Additional Secretary, Ministry of Health And Family Welfare as well as the Mission Director, National Health Mission to the Principal Secretaries, Health in all states and UTs clarifies the stand of the government in the light of implementation of Supreme Court order in the matter of North Gujarat unit of association of self-employed owners (paramedical) of private pathology laboratories of Gujarat versus North Gujarat pathologists association regarding the signing of the Laboratory reports.
The letter refers to the Gazette Notification that has been published by Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India in respect of Minimum Standards for Medical Diagnostic laboratories under Clinical Establishments Act. 2010. In light the SC order, the letter clarifies the following
As per the notification(gazette), the laboratories have been classified into three categories, basic composite, medium and advanced. The reports of the medium and advanced categories are to be signed by the doctors having a Post-graduate qualification in pathology/biochemistry/micro-biology/laboratory medicine or doctors having MBBS with PhD qualification in any of the above subjects.
For basic composite laboratory, wherever the interpretation of the medical report is required, the same is to be signed by a qualified registered medical practitioner having minimum MBBS degree and the reports which contain only numerical value/result of the test/technical analysis of samples, then signing of the report by MBBS doctors may not be essential.
"States may like to implement the above as appropriate," the letter added
Medical Dialogues team had earlier reported that the central government's Gazette notification on path lab rules had indeed become a bone of contention between the medical professionals and the government. As per the new rules, for running small labs, the presence of doctors would not be mandatory, as the manpower requirement for authorized signatory being MCI recognized doctors in such labs has only been kept as desired, not essential
Alleging that this will allow small labs to be run by nondoctors, will finally promote more quackery in laboratory medicine and will lead to mushrooming of illegal labs in the country, doctors have pointed out that the new rules will eventually put the patient at risk and dilute of the overall quality of care in medical services.
Read Also: Doctor NOT essential to run Small path labs: Health ministry Gazette
Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.