Modified 5-item frailty index may predict risk in head, neck microvascular reconstruction

Written By :  Dr. Nandita Mohan
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2021-07-02 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2021-07-02 06:37 GMT

Researchers from a recent study have found out that the modified frailty index 5 (mFI-5) is a significant predictor of risk in microvascular head and neck reconstruction. The study has been published in the American Journal of Otolaryngology. The modified frailty index 5 (mFI-5)—a scale based on the five variables diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,...

Login or Register to read the full article

Researchers from a recent study have found out that the modified frailty index 5 (mFI-5) is a significant predictor of risk in microvascular head and neck reconstruction. The study has been published in the American Journal of Otolaryngology.

The modified frailty index 5 (mFI-5)—a scale based on the five variables diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and functional dependency—has been shown to be a valid predictor of surgical outcomes.

In this study, authors, Adriana C.Panayi and colleagues from the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA sought to evaluate the ability of the mFI-5 to predict the postoperative outcomes of head and neck microvascular reconstruction.

A total of 5323 cases of microvascular reconstruction were identified, of which 3795 were head and neck cases that provided parameters necessary to calculate the mFI-5. The groups were compared in terms of demographics and comorbidities. Post-operative outcomes assessed included mortality, average operative time and length of hospital stay, surgical and medical complications, and non-home discharge.

The findings seen were-

  1. Increases in the mFI were associated with longer hospitalization periods (10.5 ± 7.5 days in mFI 0 vs 14.9 ± 15.4 in mFI ≥ 3; p < 0.0001) higher rates of mortality (1% in mFI 0 vs 3.1% in mFI ≥ 3; p = 0.02), reoperation (15.4% in mFI 0 vs 17.2% in mFI ≥ 3; p = 0.002) and unplanned readmission (7.6% in mFI 0 vs 18.8% in mFI ≥ 3; p = 0.001).

  2. Rates of any complications (p < 0.0001), as well as surgical (p < 0.002) and medical (p < 0.0001) complications specifically were higher with greater mFI scores.

  3. Higher mFI scores also predicted decreased home discharge (p < 0.0001).

  4. Differences remained significant on multivariate analysis and subgroup analysis by age.

Therefore, the authors concluded that "the mFI-5 is a significant predictor of risk in microvascular head and neck reconstruction. Subgroup analysis by age highlights that the tool can help identify younger patients who are frail and hence at risk. Through appropriate pre-operative identification of frail patients surgeons can prospectively modify their operative and discharge planning as well as post-operative support."


Tags:    
Article Source : American Journal of Otolaryngology

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News