Management of Bile Acid Diarrhea: Canadian Association of Gastroenterology guidelines

Written By :  Hina Zahid
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2020-01-21 10:09 GMT   |   Update On 2020-01-21 10:09 GMT

Canadian Association of Gastroenterology has released its latest clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Bile Acid Diarrhea. The guidelines have been published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. Chronic diarrhea affects about 5% of the population overall. Altered bile acid metabolism is a common but frequently undiagnosed cause. The most common causes of chronic diarrhea...

Login or Register to read the full article

Canadian Association of Gastroenterology has released its latest clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Bile Acid Diarrhea. The guidelines have been published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Chronic diarrhea affects about 5% of the population overall. Altered bile acid metabolism is a common but frequently undiagnosed cause. The most common causes of chronic diarrhea in clinical practice are functional disorders (eg, irritable bowel syndrome [IBS]), and inflammatory diseases (eg, Crohn's disease, celiac disease). However, a common but frequently underdiagnosed cause of chronic diarrhea is dysregulated bile acid recycling within the enterohepatic circulation: either excessive biosynthesis/secretion of bile acids or malabsorption of bile acids by the ileum.

Key recommendations are-

  • In patients with chronic nonbloody diarrhea, we recommend using risk factors (history of terminal ileal resection, cholecystectomy, or radiotherapy) as the initial assessment to identify patients with possible BAD.
  • In patients with chronic nonbloody diarrhea, we suggest against using symptom presentation as the initial assessment to identify patients with possible BAD.
  • In patients with chronic diarrhea including IBS-D and functional diarrhea, we suggest SeHCAT testing to identify patients with BAD.
  • In patients with small intestinal Crohn's disease without objective evidence of inflammation who have persistent diarrhea, we suggest SeHCAT testing.
  • In patients with chronic diarrhea including IBS-D and functional diarrhea, we suggest using a C4 assay to identify possible BAD.
  • In patients with suspected BAD, we suggest against initiating empiric BAST over-performing SeHCAT to establish a diagnosis of BAD.
  • In patients with type 1 or type 3 BAD, we suggest the use of treatments for remediable causes (eg, Crohn's disease, microscopic colitis, SIBO) in addition to treatment for BAD for induction of clinical response.
  • In patients with BAD, we suggest using cholestyramine over no treatment for induction of clinical response.
  • In patients with BAD, we suggest using cholestyramine over other BASTs as initial therapy for induction of clinical response.
  • In patients with BAD who are unable to tolerate cholestyramine, we suggest using an alternate BAST for induction of clinical response.
  • In patients with BAD receiving empiric BAST, gradual daily dose titration should be used to minimize side effects.
  • In patients with Crohn's disease with extensive ileal involvement or resection, we suggest against using BAST.

Maintenance therapy for BAD (BAST)

  • In patients with BAD who respond to BAST, we suggest that intermittent, on-demand dosing be tried.
  • In patients with BAD who are unable to tolerate BAST, we suggest using alternative antidiarrheal agents vs no treatment for long-term symptomatic therapy
  • In patients with BAD receiving empiric BAST, maintenance therapy should be used at the lowest dose needed to minimize symptoms.
  • In patients with BAD and recurrent or worsening symptoms despite stable BAST, diagnostic re-evaluation should be conducted
  • In patients being considered for BAST, a review of concurrent medications should be conducted to minimize the potential for drug interactions.
  • In patients with chronic diarrhea including IBS-D and functional diarrhea, the consensus group could not make a recommendation for or against the use of FGF19 assay to identify possible BAD
  • In patients receiving long-term maintenance therapy with BAST, the consensus group could not make a recommendation for or against measuring fat-soluble vitamin levels at baseline and annually thereafter.

For more details click on the link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.062

Tags:    
Article Source : Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News