Cold forceps polypectomy non inferior to cold snare polypectomy for tiny polyps: Study

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-06-12 15:15 GMT   |   Update On 2022-06-13 04:48 GMT

Cold forceps polypectomy is non-inferior to cold snare polypectomy for tiny polyps, according to a recent study published in the American Journal of Gastroenterology. Optimizing complete resection during colonoscopy is important as residual neoplastic tissue may play a role in interval cancers. The United States Multi-Society Task Force recommends diminutive (<5mm) and small...

Login or Register to read the full article

Cold forceps polypectomy is non-inferior to cold snare polypectomy for tiny polyps, according to a recent study published in the American Journal of Gastroenterology.

Optimizing complete resection during colonoscopy is important as residual neoplastic tissue may play a role in interval cancers. The United States Multi-Society Task Force recommends diminutive (<5mm) and small (6-9mm) polyps be removed by cold snare polypectomy (CSP). However, evidence is unclear whether CSP retains a significant advantage over cold forceps polypectomy (CFP) for polyps <3mm.

This study is a single-centre prospective non-inferiority randomized clinical trial evaluating CFP and CSP for nonpedunculated polyps <3mm. Patients >18 years of age undergoing colonoscopy for any indication were recruited. During each colonoscopy, polyps underwent block randomization to removal with CFP or CSP. Following polypectomy, two biopsies were taken from the polypectomy margin. The primary non-inferiority outcome was the complete resection rate, which was defined by the absence of residual polyp in the margin biopsies.

Results:

A total of 179 patients were included. Patients had similar distribution in age, sex, race/ethnicity, as well as indication of procedure. A total of 279 polyps <3mm were identified, with 138 in the CSP group and 141 in the CFP group. Mean polypectomy time was longer for CSP compared to CFP (42.3 vs 23.2 seconds, p<0.001), though a higher proportion of polyps removed by CFP were removed in more than one piece compared to CSP (15.6 vs 3.6%, p<0.001). There were positive margin biopsies in 2 cases per cohort, with a complete resection rate of 98.3% in both groups. There was no significant difference in cohorts in complete resection rates (difference in complete resection rates was 0.057%, 95% CI: -4.30 to 4.53%), demonstrating non-inferiority of CFP compared to CSP.

Thus, the use of CFP was non-inferior to CSP in the complete resection of nonpedunculated polyps <3mm. CSP required significantly more time to perform compared to CFP. CFP should be considered an acceptable alternative to CSP for removing polyps <3mm.

Reference:

Randomized controlled Trial Investigating cold snare aNd forceps polypectomY among small POLYPs incomplete resection rates: the TINYPOLYP Trial by Wei, Mike T. et al. published in The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001799

Keywords:

Cold, forceps, polypectomy, non inferior, cold, snare, polypectomy, tiny, polyps, The American Journal of Gastroenterology, Wei, Mike T.; Louie, Christine Y.; Chen, Yu; Pan, Jennifer Y.; Quan, Susan Y.; Wong, Robert; Brown, Ryanne; Clark, Melissa; Jensen, Kristin; Lau, Hubert; Friedland, Shai


Tags:    
Article Source : American Journal of Gastroenterology

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News