Cold forceps polypectomy non inferior to cold snare polypectomy for tiny polyps: Study
Cold forceps polypectomy is non-inferior to cold snare polypectomy for tiny polyps, according to a recent study published in the American Journal of Gastroenterology.
Optimizing complete resection during colonoscopy is important as residual neoplastic tissue may play a role in interval cancers. The United States Multi-Society Task Force recommends diminutive (<5mm) and small (6-9mm) polyps be removed by cold snare polypectomy (CSP). However, evidence is unclear whether CSP retains a significant advantage over cold forceps polypectomy (CFP) for polyps <3mm.
This study is a single-centre prospective non-inferiority randomized clinical trial evaluating CFP and CSP for nonpedunculated polyps <3mm. Patients >18 years of age undergoing colonoscopy for any indication were recruited. During each colonoscopy, polyps underwent block randomization to removal with CFP or CSP. Following polypectomy, two biopsies were taken from the polypectomy margin. The primary non-inferiority outcome was the complete resection rate, which was defined by the absence of residual polyp in the margin biopsies.
Results:
A total of 179 patients were included. Patients had similar distribution in age, sex, race/ethnicity, as well as indication of procedure. A total of 279 polyps <3mm were identified, with 138 in the CSP group and 141 in the CFP group. Mean polypectomy time was longer for CSP compared to CFP (42.3 vs 23.2 seconds, p<0.001), though a higher proportion of polyps removed by CFP were removed in more than one piece compared to CSP (15.6 vs 3.6%, p<0.001). There were positive margin biopsies in 2 cases per cohort, with a complete resection rate of 98.3% in both groups. There was no significant difference in cohorts in complete resection rates (difference in complete resection rates was 0.057%, 95% CI: -4.30 to 4.53%), demonstrating non-inferiority of CFP compared to CSP.
Thus, the use of CFP was non-inferior to CSP in the complete resection of nonpedunculated polyps <3mm. CSP required significantly more time to perform compared to CFP. CFP should be considered an acceptable alternative to CSP for removing polyps <3mm.
Reference:
Randomized controlled Trial Investigating cold snare aNd forceps polypectomY among small POLYPs incomplete resection rates: the TINYPOLYP Trial by Wei, Mike T. et al. published in The American Journal of Gastroenterology.
doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001799
Keywords:
Cold, forceps, polypectomy, non inferior, cold, snare, polypectomy, tiny, polyps, The American Journal of Gastroenterology, Wei, Mike T.; Louie, Christine Y.; Chen, Yu; Pan, Jennifer Y.; Quan, Susan Y.; Wong, Robert; Brown, Ryanne; Clark, Melissa; Jensen, Kristin; Lau, Hubert; Friedland, Shai
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.