Direct Percutaneous Endoscopic Jejunostomy Effective Alternative to surgical jejunostomy for Feeding Access

Written By :  Jacinthlyn Sylvia
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-01-09 05:30 GMT   |   Update On 2024-01-09 10:59 GMT

A recent retrospective study by John Locke and team suggests important inputs on the efficacy and safety of various methods for jejunostomy tube placements which provides enteral access for patients who are unable to meet nutritional needs orally. The findings were published in the journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.The study was conducted to compare procedural success rates and...

Login or Register to read the full article

A recent retrospective study by John Locke and team suggests important inputs on the efficacy and safety of various methods for jejunostomy tube placements which provides enteral access for patients who are unable to meet nutritional needs orally. The findings were published in the journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

The study was conducted to compare procedural success rates and complications by examining three approaches: direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ), laparoscopic (lap-J), and open laparotomy (open-J). These methods are imperative for patients who require alternative feeding routes due to their inability to consume sufficient nutrients orally.

The research was based on data from 201 patients which was classified into DPEJ, lap-J, and open-J cohorts, demonstrated comparable procedural success rates among the three groups (DPEJ 96.9%, Lap-J 99.1%, Open-J 100%, p=0.702). The infection and bleeding rates were also similar across the board with no reported cases of gastrointestinal perforation.

This study uncovered significant findings related to tube dysfunction within 90 days. The cases requiring complete removal and/or replacement were notably lower in the DPEJ group (0%) when compared to the surgical groups (lap-J 35.1%, open-J 40.0%, p<0.001). This discrepancy was primarily from increased incidents of tube clogging and dislodgement in the surgical approaches.

The findings of the study concludes that DPEJ emerges is a safe and effective alternative to surgical jejunostomy for eligible patients. DPEJ might offer a potential advantage beyond its efficacy by significantly reducing the complication rates at the critical 90-day mark. This outcomes are important for medical practitioners and patients who seek optimal enteral access solutions when considering the postoperative recovery and maintenance aspects of the jejunostomy tube placements.

Reference:

Locke, J., Norwood, D., Forrister, N., Ahmed, A. M., Aryan, M., Oster, R., Reddy, S., Kabir Baig, K. K., & Peter, S. (2023). Safety and Efficacy of Direct Percutaneous Endoscopic Jejunostomy Tube Placement Compared with Surgical Jejunostomy: A Tertiary Care Analysis. In Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.013

Tags:    
Article Source : Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News