was linked to lower risks of several GI cancers and complications compared with other oral antidiabetic drugs. However, GLP-1 RAs were associated with a higher risk of
gastroparesis and intussusception, highlighting the need for careful monitoring in vulnerable patients.
The study, led by Dr. Chengu Niu from the Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, USA, analyzed electronic health records of adults with T2D treated across the United States between 2010 and 2020. Using data from the TriNetX network, researchers conducted a retrospective cohort analysis and included 230,415 patients receiving GLP-1 RAs, matched 1:1 with an equal number of patients on other oral antidiabetic medications such as metformin, empagliflozin, and sitagliptin.
Over a five-year follow-up, the study evaluated various GI and hepatobiliary outcomes, including gastroparesis, bowel obstruction, pancreatitis, cholecystitis, and related GI cancers.
The analysis revealed the following findings:
- GLP-1 RA use was associated with a higher risk of gastroparesis (HR 1.591).
- GLP-1 RA use was associated with a higher risk of intussusception (HR 1.383).
- GLP-1 RA therapy was linked to 15%–26% lower risks of cholangitis, bowel obstruction, ileus, volvulus, chronic pancreatitis, and procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography compared to other oral antidiabetic drugs.
- GLP-1 RA users had lower risks of pancreatic cancer (HR 0.897), gastric cancer (HR 0.838), esophageal cancer (HR 0.741), and colorectal cancer (HR 0.870).
- There were no significant differences in the risk of biliary cancer or hepatocellular carcinoma between GLP-1 RA users and other oral antidiabetic drug users.
- Rates of acute pancreatitis, cholecystitis, and cholecystectomy were similar between GLP-1 RA users and the control group.
- Overall, these findings support the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists.
The findings suggest that for patients at risk of common GI malignancies or conditions such as cholangitis and bowel obstruction, GLP-1 RAs remain a viable and generally safe option. However, clinicians are advised to exercise caution in patients with preexisting gastroparesis or intussusception, who may benefit from traditional oral antidiabetic therapies instead.
The authors noted several limitations of the study. The results show associations rather than causation, and the five-year follow-up period may not fully capture long-term cancer risks. Socioeconomic factors, access to healthcare, treatment adherence, and medication switching were not assessed and could have influenced outcomes.
"The large real-world analysis supports the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes, while highlighting the need for vigilance regarding specific complications such as gastroparesis and intussusception. Further long-term studies are needed to confirm these findings and to better assess potential cancer risks associated with GLP-1 RA therapy," the authors concluded.
Reference:
Niu, Chengu MD1,a; Sun, Kefang MD1; Zhang, Jing MD2; Elkhapery, Ahmed MD1; Zhu, Kaiwen MD1; Malik, Sheza MD1; Xue, Chao MD1; Okolo, Patrick I MD3. Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Safety of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. The American Journal of Gastroenterology ():10.14309/ajg.0000000000003760, September 03, 2025. | DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003760
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.