Study finds mesalazine ineffective against irritable bowel syndrome
Sweden: A recent study published in Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics suggests that mesalazine has little effect on irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms and mucosal patch technology cannot predict a greater likelihood of responding to mesalazine based on rectal measures of immune activity.
The current definition of irritable bowel syndrome, a functional bowel illness, excludes objective biomarkers and is based on the coexistence of stomach discomfort and changed bowel habits that last for at least six months. In the case of irritable bowel syndrome, low-grade immune activity in the gut represents a possible therapeutic target. Valeria Castro Tejera and colleagues undertook this study in order to ascertain if IBS symptoms improve following mesalazine treatment and the usefulness of measurements of immunological activity in the rectal mucosa.
In this randomized, multicenter study, mesalazine 2400 mg or placebo once daily was used as the therapy for eight weeks in participants with IBS (according to Rome III criteria). The main objective was the overall evaluation of a ≥50% or more improvement in IBS symptoms during the intervention period. The IBS severity score method was also used to quantify IBS symptoms, and mucosal patch technology was used to assess immune function. Mesalazine studies for IBS that were randomized, placebo-controlled, and analyzed post hoc were included.
The key findings of this study were:
1. From the 181 patients that were enrolled, 91 received mesalazine, and 90 received a placebo.
2. 32 (36%) individuals who received mesalazine and 27 (30%) patients who received placebo met the main objective.
3. Regarding the IBS subtype or the development of post-infection symptoms, there were no differences in response rates.
4. The mesalazine group showed a greater decrease in abdominal bloating.
5. The meta-analysis revealed that mesalazine had no impact on IBS symptoms.
6. Mesalazine response could not be predicted using mucosal patch technology, and there were no changes in the effects of the intervention on immunological marker levels.
In conclusion, after 8 weeks of therapy, mesalazine is unsuccessful in relieving IBS symptoms. Measures using mucosal patches are unable to identify immune activity indicators that can forecast a higher likelihood of responding to mesalazine therapy.
Reference:
Castro Tejera, V., Öhman, L., Aabakken, L., Fellström, B., Hausken, T., Hovde, Ø., Hreinsson, J. P., Lindberg, G., & Törnblom, H. (2022). Randomised clinical trial and meta‐analysis: mesalazine treatment in irritable bowel syndrome—effects on gastrointestinal symptoms and rectal biomarkers of immune activity. In Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (Vol. 56, Issue 6, pp. 968–979). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17182
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.