NMC may reconsider 3-year rotatory headship in medical colleges, retain merit-based HoD appointment system: Report
National Medical Commission
New Delhi: Instead of implementing the proposed 3-year rotatory headship in medical colleges, the National Medical Commission may reconsider the policy and retain the existing system that allows flexibility in the HoD tenure and appointment based on merit in medical colleges, Careers360 has reported.
The Apex Medical Commission made this decision after receiving approximately 421 suggestions from medical colleges, academicians, and subject-matter experts on the matter.
Medical Dialogues had reported last year that, proposing changes in the Postgraduate Medical Education Regulations 2023, the NMC had issued amendments and invited feedback from the stakeholders.
NMC's draft regulations, "Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations (Amendment), 2025" were published in the official Gazette on May 30, 2025. In this draft, the Commission proposed to introduce a rotatory headship and include M.S. (Traumatology and Surgery) as a feeder broad speciality qualification for M.Ch Neurosurgery, M.Ch Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, and M.Ch. Vascular Surgery courses.
Also Read:NMC proposes 3-year Rotatory Headship in Medical College Depts
Regulation 7.1 of the PGMER 2023 discusses the structure of a Department, its Units, its Faculties- Professors, Associate Professors, Assistant Professors, and other members of the Department, including Senior and Junior Residents. Regarding headship, the 2023 Regulations stated that "Each Department will be headed by a Professor."
To amend this, NMC in the draft regulation (Amendment), mentioned that Department headship shall be changed on a rotation basis every three years among Professors and Associate Professors who are eligible to become Professors.
The Commission had proposed to add the following to the existing Regulation 7.1 of PGMER 2023:
"The post of the Head of Department (HoD) will be rotated every three-years amongst Professors and Associate Professors who are eligible to become Professor, who holds Medical Post-graduate degree, based on seniority in the Department."
As per the latest media report by Careers360, NMC received around 512 responses- including 421 recommendations related to HoD rotation revision. Among these, 249 responses were made opposing the policy, while 172 responses supported it, according to an official statement.
The statement further added that submitting their responses, the stakeholders recommended that academic leadership should be merit-based, and factors such as administrative capacity, research output, and teaching excellence should be considered.
They also expressed that the fixed HoD tenure will lead to workplace imbalance and could invite dispute. "Frequent changes in leadership could destabilize academic planning and regulatory compliance. Junior Associate Professors may end up supervising senior Professors, leading to workplace disharmony," added the stakeholders.
"Mandatory rotation without merit criteria may foster internal conflicts. The regulation may undermine the discretion of institutions in selecting their HoDs based on performance and context," they further opined.
Taking these responses and suggestions into consideration, the Postgraduate Medical Education Board (PGMEB) of NMC has recommended that the mandatory rotation of HoD tenure should be "revisited".
Therefore, PGMEB has suggested continuing with the existing system for better flexibility in the HoD tenure and to introduce periodic performance reviews by a competent authority to ensure credibility and accountability.
Apart from this, the PG Board has also suggested a few key points on the HoD tenure, stating, "Retain the current system that allows flexibility in HoD tenure. Introduce periodic performance review mechanisms by a competent authority. Ensure leadership transitions are guided by institutional need, academic excellence, and proven administrative capability rather than rigid tenure limits."
"This approach will ensure that departmental leadership remains robust, accountable, and aligned with the evolving demands of postgraduate medical education and research in India," added the Board.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.