Hospital Wins Rs 1 crore Defamation Lawsuit against Patient who left without paying bill
New Delhi: In a first of its kind decision, a pune court has directed a patient, who had left the hospital without paying the complete hospital bill, to pay the entire remaining sum while also directing him to pay Rs 1 Crore with interest as damages to the hospital for all the defamation that was caused by him afterwards
The case was filed by Aditya Birla Hospital in Pune in the year 2013 after encountering a patient who left the hospital without paying the bill and consequently, articles were published in the newspaper with respect to the hospital which were allegedly defamatory in nature.
The hospital informed the court that On 04/01/2013 at about 6.10 am the said patient, was brought in the hospital by his own vehicle with a complaint of retrosternal chest pain, left arm pain and back pain with profuse sweating. He was immediately taken to cardiac section in the emergency department and he was examined by Dr Tapsale. Thereafter, Dr Kalia examined him and performed 2D Echo cardiography, on that report defendant was admitted in the hospital. The doctors had discussed with patient's friend, relatives and decided to have Coronary angiography Sos Coronary Angioplasty.
Accordingly, a friend of defendant accompanied the defendant and had signed document for consent and the defendant was shifted to Cathlab for Angiography. In the Angiography report, it was found there was 100% occluded proximal LAD artery and 50% stenosis of LCX artery. After going through angioplasty report wife of the defendant and his friend were informed that angioplasty is required to be done. The wife of defendant agreed to carry out angioplasty and it was carried out on the 04/01/2013 at 12.30 pm. The defendant was given all the medical attention in an emergency with the belief and faith that he will make the payment i.e. hospital charges, doctors charges and other charges including that the stent. The patient deposited a sum of Rs.40,000/.
On 08/01/2013 the defendant was required to be discharged on payment of an outstanding bill of Rs.4,29,794.91/.
After complete recovery and on receipt of bill the defendant started disputing bill as well as treatment. The patient along with other 25 persons without taking proper clinical discharge left the hospital without paying the bill.
The hospital further alleged that the defendant circulated defamatory contents in newspaper. The reputation of Directors of plaintiff hospital was also damaged in their personal capacity and required to answer various clients. Due to the said act of the defendant, they not only suffered mental agony but harm has been caused to their reputation. Therefore, the plaintiff hospital is entitled for damages to the extent of Rs.1,00,00,000/.
On 31/01/2013 the hospital issued a notice through its advocate to which the defendant replied but, failed to repay the treatment charges. Hence, this suit. The defendant in spite of service of suit summons failed to appear hence, the suit proceeded exparte against him
The court went through all the documents related to the case, including the medical reports, the bills, the media reports, the doctor's submissions, the consents as well as the financial consents that were signed in the matter. The court analysed the case based on the following questions
The court took into record to testimonies of various witnesses, doctors, and all records and noted
.....the documents filed on record clearly reveals that the doctors of plaintiff has performed operation and the defendant without paying the entire treatment charges left the hospital. Therefore, considering the unchallenged testimonies of witnesses and documents placed on record I hold that the plaintiff proved that an amount of Rs.3,89,795/is due and outstanding against the defendant......
2. Whether the hospital was entitled to the damages claimed?
The court held that the defendant was treated for cardiac ailment but instead of payment of treatment charges had circulated defamatory contents in newspaper. The court further held that the act of defendant not only cause mental agony but also harm the reputation of plaintiff hospital in the public at large.
"Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled for damages against the defendant to the extent of Rs.1,00,00,000/," it stated
The court further upheld that the hospital was entitled to interest on the above damages. The court then directed the patient to pay Rs.1,03,89,795 along with an interest at the rate 18% p.a. on the said amount from the date of filing of suit till its realization.
The case was filed by Aditya Birla Hospital in Pune in the year 2013 after encountering a patient who left the hospital without paying the bill and consequently, articles were published in the newspaper with respect to the hospital which were allegedly defamatory in nature.
The hospital informed the court that On 04/01/2013 at about 6.10 am the said patient, was brought in the hospital by his own vehicle with a complaint of retrosternal chest pain, left arm pain and back pain with profuse sweating. He was immediately taken to cardiac section in the emergency department and he was examined by Dr Tapsale. Thereafter, Dr Kalia examined him and performed 2D Echo cardiography, on that report defendant was admitted in the hospital. The doctors had discussed with patient's friend, relatives and decided to have Coronary angiography Sos Coronary Angioplasty.
Accordingly, a friend of defendant accompanied the defendant and had signed document for consent and the defendant was shifted to Cathlab for Angiography. In the Angiography report, it was found there was 100% occluded proximal LAD artery and 50% stenosis of LCX artery. After going through angioplasty report wife of the defendant and his friend were informed that angioplasty is required to be done. The wife of defendant agreed to carry out angioplasty and it was carried out on the 04/01/2013 at 12.30 pm. The defendant was given all the medical attention in an emergency with the belief and faith that he will make the payment i.e. hospital charges, doctors charges and other charges including that the stent. The patient deposited a sum of Rs.40,000/.
On 08/01/2013 the defendant was required to be discharged on payment of an outstanding bill of Rs.4,29,794.91/.
After complete recovery and on receipt of bill the defendant started disputing bill as well as treatment. The patient along with other 25 persons without taking proper clinical discharge left the hospital without paying the bill.
The hospital further alleged that the defendant circulated defamatory contents in newspaper. The reputation of Directors of plaintiff hospital was also damaged in their personal capacity and required to answer various clients. Due to the said act of the defendant, they not only suffered mental agony but harm has been caused to their reputation. Therefore, the plaintiff hospital is entitled for damages to the extent of Rs.1,00,00,000/.
On 31/01/2013 the hospital issued a notice through its advocate to which the defendant replied but, failed to repay the treatment charges. Hence, this suit. The defendant in spite of service of suit summons failed to appear hence, the suit proceeded exparte against him
The court went through all the documents related to the case, including the medical reports, the bills, the media reports, the doctor's submissions, the consents as well as the financial consents that were signed in the matter. The court analysed the case based on the following questions
- Whether the Amount of Treatment is due to the hospital ?
The court took into record to testimonies of various witnesses, doctors, and all records and noted
.....the documents filed on record clearly reveals that the doctors of plaintiff has performed operation and the defendant without paying the entire treatment charges left the hospital. Therefore, considering the unchallenged testimonies of witnesses and documents placed on record I hold that the plaintiff proved that an amount of Rs.3,89,795/is due and outstanding against the defendant......
2. Whether the hospital was entitled to the damages claimed?
The court held that the defendant was treated for cardiac ailment but instead of payment of treatment charges had circulated defamatory contents in newspaper. The court further held that the act of defendant not only cause mental agony but also harm the reputation of plaintiff hospital in the public at large.
"Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled for damages against the defendant to the extent of Rs.1,00,00,000/," it stated
The perusal of documents especially the police complaint filed by the plaintiff and articles published in the newspaper with respect to the plaintiff hospital I hold that the articles published in different newspapers are defamatory per se. These articles undisputedly caused mental agony and harm to the reputation of plaintiff and its office bearers. It is an admitted fact that the plaintiff hospital is a reputed hospital all over the India as well as International. If really, the defendant had any grievance about medical treatment or medical bill charged then he has many recourses available to purforth his grievance and prayed for justice, but he failed to do so. Moreover, instead of choosing a legal way the defendant became self-proclaimed judge and passed judgment against the plaintiff hospital by defaming it.
As mentioned above, the plaintiff hospital has reputation in the society of large and a defamation without any formal proof will definitely harm its reputation and will also cause mental agony to its Directors and all other staff members who are providing services for a good cause. Therefore, considering the above mentioned reasons and documents placed on record, I hold that the defendant is liable to pay damages of Rs.1,00,00,000/to the plaintiff towards defamation, damage to reputation of plaintiff hospital and causing harassment and mental agony to its office bearers. Therefore, considering the unchallenged testimonies of plaintiff's witnesses and documents placed on record I hold that the plaintiff is entitled for damages of Rs.1,00,00,000/from the defendant.
The court further upheld that the hospital was entitled to interest on the above damages. The court then directed the patient to pay Rs.1,03,89,795 along with an interest at the rate 18% p.a. on the said amount from the date of filing of suit till its realization.
Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.