SULF-FAST may help identify those at low risk of sulfa allergy: JAMA

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-06-10 05:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-06-10 06:50 GMT
Advertisement

Australia: A recent study in JAMA Network Open has shown the strong performance of an allergy clinical decision rule known as SULF-FAST in identifying those with low-risk trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole allergy. SULF-FAST is an adapted version of the penicillin allergy clinical decision tool PEN-FAST.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is a first-line treatment for many infections; however, sulfa allergy limits its use. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is frequently needed by antimicrobial stewardship programs to prevent the use of more restricted antibiotics. Studies with nonstandardized challenge criteria indicate that those with low-risk allergy phenotypes can safely undergo direct oral challenges (OCs); however, no current risk-stratification tool exists to guide challenges.

Advertisement

Jamie L. Waldron, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia, and colleagues sought to adapt PEN-FAST, a penicillin allergy clinical decision tool, for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole allergy.

The research team adapted the PEN-FAST tool for creating SULF-FAST, a clinical decision rule for TMP-SMX (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) allergy. They used two US and Australian datasets to validate the SULF-FAST tool.

The research team defined a positive test result as a positive patch test (PT) result or the occurrence of a clinician-observed or patient-reported presumed immune-mediated reaction following the challenge. The team calculated the PEN-FAST score and its diagnostic performance for each cohort and subgroup based on allergy phenotype.

The study included adult patients aged 18 or above who reported nonsevere sulfa or TMP-SMX allergy and consented to undergo direct oral challenges. The PEN-FAST score and its diagnostic performance were calculated for each cohort and subgroup.

The study led to the following findings:

  • The prevalence of positive TMP-SMX allergy test results was 5.2% in Australia and 6.4% in the US.
  • The adapted PEN-FAST tool showed good discrimination in determining true allergy in the Australian cohort, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86.
  • A low PEN-FAST score (<3) indicated to the team a low allergy risk (<5%), while a score of 3 or more showed a higher allergy risk (>20%).
  • The tool had a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 96.4% in identifying this allergy.
  • In the US cohort, the tool was shown to have an AUC of 0.67, with a sensitivity of 38.5% and specificity of 89.5%. The tool also performed well in identifying immediate reactions but had a lower performance for the delayed phenotype.
  • Good performance was seen for immediate reactions but lower for the delayed phenotype.
  • Of 115 individuals with long-term prescribing data, 45 received a trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole course without adverse reactions.

"Although the single-dose challenge was protocolized, the high tolerance rate of multiple extended trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment doses is reassuring for omitting delayed hypersensitivity," the authors wrote. "Further validation is needed for widespread implementation."

Reference:

Waldron JL, Rose M, Vogrin S, et al. Development and Validation of a Sulfa Antibiotic Allergy Clinical Decision Rule. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(6):e2316776. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.16776


Tags:    
Article Source : JAMA Network Open

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News