SGLT2 inhibitors use tied to lower risk of kidney stones in patients with type 2 diabetes

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-01-31 05:45 GMT   |   Update On 2024-01-31 06:53 GMT
Advertisement

USA: The use of SGLT2 inhibitors in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) may lower nephrolithiasis risk compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists or DPP4 inhibitors, a recent study has revealed.

The study findings, published in JAMA Internal Medicine, may help inform decision-making when prescribing glucose-lowering agents for patients at risk for developing nephrolithiasis.

The cohort study comprised 1 378 462 commercially insured adults with T2D initiated treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors. Those initiating SGLT2i treatment had a lowered risk of developing nephrolithiasis compared with those initiating the other two treatments.

Advertisement

There has been an increasing prevalence of kidney stones worldwide. Kidney stones are associated with substantial costs, cardiovascular disease, kidney function decline, and fractures. Type 2 diabetes is associated with an elevated risk of kidney stones.

SGLT2 inhibitors, a newer class of glucose-lowering agents with demonstrated renoprotective and cardiovascular benefits in clinical trials, might lower the risk of nephrolithiasis by altering urine composition and increasing urine volume. However, no studies have investigated the association between SGLT2i use and nephrolithiasis risk in patients receiving routine care in the US. To fill this knowledge gap, Julie M. Paik, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, and colleagues aimed to investigate the association between SGLT2i use and nephrolithiasis risk in clinical practice.

For this purpose, they conducted a new-user, active comparator cohort study using data from commercially insured adults (aged ≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes who initiated treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors, and DPP4 inhibitors between 2013 and 2020.

The primary outcome was nephrolithiasis diagnosis by the International Classification of Diseases codes in the outpatient or inpatient setting. New users of SGLT2 inhibitors had a 1:1 propensity score matched to new users of DPP4 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists in pairwise comparisons. Incidence rates, rate differences (RDs), and estimated hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated.

After 1:1 propensity score matching, 716 406 adults with T2D initiating an SGLT2i or a GLP-1RA (mean age, 61.4 years for both groups; 51.4% versus 51.2% female; 48.6% versus 48.5% male) and 662 056 adults initiating an SGLT2i or a DPP4i (mean age, 61.8 vs 61.7 years; 47.4% versus 47.3% female; 52.6% vs 52.7% male) were included.

The study led to the following findings:

  • Over a median follow-up of 192 days, the risk of nephrolithiasis was lower in patients initiating an SGLT2i than among those initiating a GLP-1RA (14.9 vs 21.3 events per 1000 person-years; HR, 0.69; RD, −6.4) or a DPP4i (14.6 vs 19.9 events per 1000 person-years; HR, 0.74; RD, −5.3).
  • The association between SGLT2i use and nephrolithiasis risk was similar by sex, race and ethnicity, history of chronic kidney disease, and obesity.
  • The magnitude of the risk reduction with SGLT2i use was larger among adults aged younger than 70 years versus those aged 70 years or older (HR, 0.85; RD, −3.46 per 1000 person-years).

"These results suggest that nephrolithiasis risk could be a consideration when deciding among glucose-lowering agents for patients with type 2 diabetes," the researchers concluded.

Reference:

Paik JM, Tesfaye H, Curhan GC, Zakoul H, Wexler DJ, Patorno E. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Nephrolithiasis Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA Intern Med. Published online January 29, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7660


Tags:    
Article Source : JAMA Internal Medicine

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News