Warfarin safe and effective option for managing hemodialysis patients with AF

Written By :  Dr. Hiral patel
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-06-29 17:58 GMT   |   Update On 2023-10-16 11:07 GMT
Advertisement

Egypt: In patients on dialysis who require anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (AF), warfarin could be safe and efficient compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), states an article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. Compared to DOACs, warfarin was shown to be associated with a significant reduction in the rates of systemic embolization, minor bleeding, and death. 

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia. Patients with AF who have severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) requiring dialysis have significantly higher incidence rates of ischemic stroke. Also, patients who have end-stage renal disease (ESRD), have a higher risk of AF and an increase in the incidence of bleeding and complications. For a long, warfarin has been the cornerstone of anticoagulation in patients with AF. The safety of warfarin in patients on dialysis is questionable as it may cause a higher incidence of bleeding. Additionally, the efficacy of warfarin in stroke prevention among patients with AF who are on dialysis is also debatable. DOACs have been demonstrated to be non-inferior to warfarin in mild to moderate CKD.

Advertisement

The use of DOACs in patients who have both atrial fibrillation (AF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis remains controversial, with warfarin remaining the mainstay of the treatment.

Sohil Elfar, Portsaid University, Egypt, and colleagues conducted a study to review the current evidence investigating the safety profile and the efficacy of DOACs in comparison with warfarin in patients with AF and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis.

In their meta-analysis, researchers included five studies with a total of 34,516 patients. Of these, 31,472 (92.14%) received warfarin and 3,044 patients received DOACs (8.91%).The outcomes were set as major bleeding, ischemic stroke, systemic embolization, hemorrhagic stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, minor bleeding, and death.

Key findings of the study,

• There was no significant difference in the incidence of hemorrhagic stroke, major bleeding, hemodialysis access site bleeding, ischemic stroke, and GI bleeding between DOACs and warfarin.

• There were higher rates of systemic embolization, minor bleeding, and death events in patients who received DOACs than in the warfarin group (3.39% vs. 1.97%), (6.78% vs. 2.2%), and (11.38% vs. 5.12%) respectively.

Researchers concluded that in patients on dialysis who require anticoagulation for AF, DOACs were as effective as warfarin in the prevention of stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, major bleeding, and GI bleeding but warfarin led to a significant reduction in minor bleeding, systemic embolization, and death compared to DOACs.

Further prospective studies are needed to validate the present study findings and to address the best strategy to manage the increased thrombotic and bleeding risks in such patients, the authors suggested.

Reference:

Elfar S, Elzeiny SM, Ismail H, Makkeyah Y, Ibrahim M. Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Hemodialysis Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 9;9:847286. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.847286. PMID: 35757350; PMCID: PMC9218480.

Tags:    
Article Source : Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News