The plea challenged the Goa High Court order, which refused to direct the reevaluation of their answer books, observing that the Goa University followed norms by not permitting them to make any application for reevaluation.
The HC held that when the students appeared for the examination, the bar imposed under the Ordinance OA-5 for revaluation operated in full force, not permitting them to make any application for re-evaluation.
Refusing to interfere with the High Court’s decision, the top court said, "We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court; hence, the special leave petition is dismissed."
Also read- Supreme Court orders probe into Gujarat Ayurveda colleges over illegal BAMS, BHMS admissions
As per a latest media report by TOI, the case concerns the students who had appeared for the supplementary examination held in April–May last year and were declared failed. They approached the Bombay High Court at Goa seeking directions to Goa University to allow re-evaluation of their answer sheets.
Alternatively, the students requested the court to order a re-examination of the answer sheets of all students who had failed in that exam.
The students argued that they were only given the chance to apply for verification of marks and not re-evaluation. After the verification was carried out, all of them were again shown to have failed, and there were no changes in their marks.
However, the High Court in its final order on Dec 4, 2025, dismissed the plea. The court noted that there was an absence of a provision for re-evaluation and a specific bar mentioned in the ordinances for re-evaluation.
The High Court held that when the students appeared for the examination, the ordinance prohibiting re-evaluation was fully in force. Therefore, Goa University had not committed any error in refusing to accept applications for re-evaluation.
With the Supreme Court now declining to interfere, the High Court’s order stands, and the students will not be granted re-evaluation of their answer sheets.
Also read- Must be no 'devious reason': Supreme Court directs NBE to explain NEET PG 2025 reduced cutoff
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.