Bombay HC denies permission to terminate 28-week pregnancy of minor rape survivor

The HC bench noted a child would be born whether by forcible medical intervention or by natural delivery.

If a forcible delivery is to be done, then an underdeveloped child would be born and there would be chances of certain deformities being developed, it said.

“If in any case the child is going to be born and the natural delivery is just 12 weeks away, we are of the view that the health of the child and its physical and mental development need to be considered,” the high court said.

“When a live child is going to be born even today, we might as well let the child be born after 12 weeks and under medical advice. If later the petitioner desires to give away the child to an orphanage, she shall have the liberty to do so,” it said.

The disadvantage of permitting forcible delivery of the child today is that the child who would have naturally developed into a well-grown baby will have to be brought into this world at a premature stage and that too forcibly, the court said.

If the baby is well developed and delivered naturally as a full-term baby, there would be no deformity and the chances of adoption would brighten, the HC said.

The girl’s mother then sought the court to permit the girl to be kept in some NGO or hospital till she delivers the child.

The court said the girl could be kept either at a shelter home in Nashik which cares for pregnant women or the government’s shelter home for women in Aurangabad.

After the baby is delivered, the girl will be at liberty to take a decision on whether to keep the baby or give the child up for adoption, the HC said.

Also Read:LNJP Hospital to not disclose identity of minor girl seeking termination of pregnancy: Delhi HC