Bombay HC grants anticipatory bail to doctor couple accused of defrauding 5 people of Rs 41 lakh

Published On 2024-11-25 07:20 GMT   |   Update On 2024-11-25 07:20 GMT
Advertisement

Pune: The Bombay High Court has granted anticipatory bail to a doctor and his wife, who are accused of defrauding five individuals of Rs 41 lakh since 2022. The couple was booked by the Pimpri Chinchwad police for allegedly promising these individuals commercial spaces in their multi-specialty hospital at Dehu Road to set up pharmacy and pathology lab outlets, but failing to deliver the same.

The Dehu Road police registered an FIR against the doctor couple accusing them of cheating and criminal breach of trust under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) on August 10th. The couple fearing their arrest approached the Vadgaon Maval court to secure anticipatory bail, but their request was rejected. They then approached the High Court seeking relief. 

Advertisement

Also Read: Delhi Court grants bails to doctor couple accused under POCSO Act

On November 14, 2024, the Bombay High Court bench, led by Justice Manish Pitale, noted that the documents highlighted that the transactions between the informant and the applicants (doctor couple) took place in December 2022. However, the FIR was registered after an inordinate delay on August 8, 2024. 

Anticipatory bail is a legal provision that allows a person to be released on bail even before they are arrested. Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code governs anticipatory bail. In this case, the Bombay High Court’s decision to grant anticipatory bail was based on the fact that the accusations seemed to revolve around a commercial dispute and were not criminal.

Also Read: Cannot simply shut our eyes to serious allegations! SC denies relief to Fortis Doctor Accused of Illegal Kidney Transplants

According to the recent media report, Lawyers Ganesh Gupta and Roshini Naaz, representing the doctor couple commenting on the case told TOI, "Our clients will now file a writ petition in the HC to quash the FIR registered against them. The informants can seek remedy to settle their financial dispute before the civil court." 
Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News