Rajasthan HC issues notices over alleged illegal appointment of 2 medical officers

Written By :  Adity Saha
Published On 2025-11-20 06:15 GMT   |   Update On 2025-11-20 06:22 GMT

Rajasthan High Court

Advertisement

Jaipur: Two doctors who completed their MBBS degrees abroad have come under scrutiny after the Rajasthan High Court directed the state government and other authorities to explain how they were appointed to government service.  

A single Bench Justice Ashok Kumar Jain has issued notices after hearing a petition that both the doctors reportedly hid important details during the recruitment process conducted by the Rajasthan University of Health Sciences (RUHS).  

Advertisement

Also read- HC stays Transfer of RUHS Medical, Dental Colleges to State

According to a TOI news report, a petition filed by Aman Kumar alleged that Dr Arvind Kumar was appointed in 2013, and Manoj Kumar Yadav was appointed in 2015, under the Rajasthan Medical and Health Services. However, they did not possess the requisite statutory qualifications at the time of their appointments.  

Both are residents of Haryana and obtained their MBBS degrees from Kazakhstan and Tajikistan, respectively, but the petitioner claimed that they concealed material facts during the recruitment process conducted by the Rajasthan University of Health Sciences (RUHS).

The plea argued that their appointments violate the National Commission Act, the Rajasthan Medical Act, and the rules of the Rajasthan Medical Council.

After examining the petition, the court directed the principal secretary, health, the registrar, Registrar of Rajasthan University of Health Sciences (RUHS), and the Rajasthan Medical Council to file their responses.

The case will come up again on November 20.

Medical Dialogues had previously reported that the Rajasthan High Court directed the Rajasthan University of Health Sciences (RUHS) to form an expert committee to examine whether an MBBS student, who became 100 per cent blind after a 2017 road accident, can be allowed to resume her studies.

The student, who joined the MBBS course in 2014 and cleared her first two years, was barred from continuing due to the practical training requirements in surgery and clinical procedures. While a medical board in 2020 recommended permitting her to pursue the course, a subsequent board held a contrary view, stating she would not be able to discharge a doctor’s duties effectively. 

Also read- Rajasthan HC orders expert panel to examine MBBS student's plea to continue course after losing vision

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News