RG Kar Medico Death Case: Supreme Court asks CBI to file fresh status report

Published On 2024-09-10 07:00 GMT   |   Update On 2024-09-10 07:00 GMT

Kolkata: Following a Supreme Court hearing on the suo motu petition concerning the brutal rape and murder of a postgraduate medico at RG Kar Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata, the Court has directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to submit a fresh status report by next week.

According to an ANI report, senior Advocate Kapil Sibal informed the court today that the West Bengal Government had filed a status report, noting that 23 people had died when doctors were not working. Meanwhile, the court was told the CBI has filed the status report. A bench headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud inquired about the distance between the residence of the Principal of RG Medical College and the hospital. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta responded that it is approximately 15-20 minutes away.

The Court sought clarification regarding the timing of the registration of the report of the unnatural death. Sibal mentioned that the death certificate was issued at 1:47 PM, but the police entry for the unnatural death was made at 2:55 PM. The Court also asked about the timing of the search and seizure, which Sibal stated took place from 8:30 PM to 10:45 PM.

Also Read:Kolkata rape-murder case outrage: 2 Doctors Resign From Medical Council Seeking Suspension of RG Kar Suspects

The court inquired whether CCTV footage related to the incident was handed over to the CBI. Mehta confirmed that four clips totaling 27 minutes were provided. The CBI has decided to send the samples to AIIMS and other central forensic labs for further analysis.

During the hearing, the SG also raised concerns about security personnel at RG Kar Medical College. The Supreme Court then ordered that a senior state home department officer and a senior CISF officer ensure that all three CISF companies receive accommodation nearby. Additionally, the court directed that all requisitions needed by CISF personnel be compiled today and that security gadgets be provided by 9 PM.

Last month, the Supreme Court had expressed serious concerns over the handling of the case, questioning the West Bengal police about delays in filing the First Information Report (FIR), the handling of the deceased doctor’s body, and the lack of protection for medical staff during a mob attack.

A bench led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, along with Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Mishra, expressed serious concerns about the handling of the case. The Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance of the rape and murder of the doctor and questioned the West Bengal police about the delay in lodging the FIR. The court noted that the FIR was registered at 11:45 PM, more than three hours after the body was handed over to the family for cremation at 8:30 PM. The court remarked, "If women cannot go to work and be safe, we are denying them the basic right to equality. We have to do something", news agency ANI reported.

The court also criticized the hospital's initial response, questioning why the incident was initially considered a suicide. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal confirmed it was a murder case and added information about the delay in registering the FIR. Additionally, the court learned that police officers stationed at the hospital fled during the attack, leaving medical staff vulnerable. Senior Advocate Aprajita Singh stated that many doctors have since left the hospital due to safety concerns.

In response, the Supreme Court had called for increased security at the hospital and urged medical professionals across India to return to work.

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News