AIIMS Deoghar burns ward under HC scanner; seeks steps to operationalise care

Written By :  Annapurna
Published On 2026-02-05 09:45 GMT   |   Update On 2026-02-05 09:45 GMT

GMCH-32 Trauma Centre to Launch July 28

Advertisement

Ranchi: The Jharkhand High Court on Wednesday sought accountability from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Deoghar, over the functioning of its burns ward, stressing the importance of emergency burn care in a tertiary medical institution. The court directed the hospital administration to submit the steps taken to operationalise burn treatment services.

A division bench comprising Chief Justice M.S. Sonak and Justice Rajesh Shankar was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) that was initiated suo motu by the High Court. The bench specifically asked AIIMS Deoghar to clarify whether emergency services in the burns ward had been made functional and, if so, since when, underscoring the hospital’s duty towards critical care patients.

Advertisement

According to TOI, the PIL was initiated by the High Court on August 30, 2022, following media reports about the death of a young burn victim, which raised serious concerns about access to specialised burn management facilities. The case highlighted gaps in emergency referral systems and burn care infrastructure in the region.

The victim was a Class XII student from Dumka who had sustained extensive burn injuries after being attacked by a man from her locality. She was initially taken to a local hospital and later referred to Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Ranchi, where she succumbed to her injuries on August 28, 2022, despite medical intervention.

The incident had triggered wider questions about the availability and readiness of specialised burn units in Jharkhand, particularly at centrally funded institutions like AIIMS Deoghar. Following the incident, the police arrested the accused and his aide, and both were later convicted and sentenced by the Dumka Sessions Court.

The High Court’s ongoing scrutiny, however, remains focused on the medical and institutional response—especially whether advanced burn care facilities were available and accessible at the time of the incident—reflecting the judiciary’s emphasis on strengthening emergency medical services and ensuring that critical care infrastructure functions as mandated.

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News