Pet Peeves: NEIGRIHMS bans pets in doctors' hostel, medicos see red

Published On 2023-09-14 07:15 GMT   |   Update On 2024-11-05 05:56 GMT
Advertisement

Shillong: In a recent development at the North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences (NEIGRIHMS), resident physicians and pet guardians have expressed their outrage over a decision to ban pets from the Resident Medical Officer (RMO) hostel. 

The directive, issued by the institute's director, was communicated to residents by the RMO hostel's warden on September 6. The notification explicitly forbids keeping pets in any of the resident doctor's rooms at the hostel. Furthermore, the directive provided a maximum of three days for residents to find new homes for their pets.

Advertisement

Also Read:Centre asks NEIGHRIMS to submit proposal for air ambulance

Violators of this order face strict penalties, including a fine of Rs 10,000. The hostel could also expel repeat offenders.

“A maximum of three (3) days time will be given in this regard to relocate their pets if anyone is having one and if anyone found violating the above order stern actions will be taken against them by the authority concerned and they will be subjected to penalty of Rs 10,000 and if found the same being repeated then they will be debark from the hostel (sic),” the notice read. 

In response to the controversial decision, pet owners and medical professionals associated with NEIGRIHMS have written to the institution's director to reconsider the prohibition.

Northeast Today reports that the affected parties have also sought assistance from People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) India to help them navigate this situation. PETA India is expected to send a formal letter to the NEIGRIHMS director, requesting the lift of the pet ban.

The resident doctors have strongly opposed the notice, citing ethical issues and legal justifications. They argue that as medical professionals, they are required to be available at all times in case of emergencies, making it unreasonable and impractical to give up their pets to comply with the directive.

Tags:    
Article Source : with inputs

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News