While considering the case involving the medical reimbursement claim of a senior citizen, Chief Justice Sheel Nagu asserted that the entitlement to reimbursement for medical expenses incurred by government employees could not be sacrificed at the altar of technicalities when the delay was not inordinate and there was a genuine reason for the said delay.
With this observation, the HC bench comprising Chief Justice Sheel Nagu granted relief to the senior citizen, whose plea for medical reimbursement was rejected by the Jind District Elementary Education Officer in May 2013 and Julana Block Education Officer in June 2013 merely on the ground of delay.
"The claim for medical reimbursement, which is otherwise due to the petitioner, cannot be denied merely on specious ground of marginal delay since such right is directly linked to the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India," observed the Chief Justice.
Also Read: Bombay HC Slams Centre, CGHS for Denying Heart Transplant Surgery Reimbursement, Orders Rs 30 Lakh Payout
As per the latest media report by The Tribune, the petitioner retired from service and remained admitted for neurosurgery between September 19 and 24, 2011. On May 7, 2013, the petitioner submitted the medical reimbursement claim, after a delay attributed to the petitioner's mental health conditions. However, the medical reimbursement claim of Rs 1,52,364 was rejected, citing that the claim was time-barred and the petitioner had received the treatment as an outpatient.
When the matter came before the HC bench, the State, in its written statement, referred to the executive instructions dated December 11, 2003, which explicitly permitted consideration of delayed claims.
Referring to the instructions, the Court observed that the competent authority could consider even the claims submitted after a year. The bench opined that the competent authority was rather empowered to condone any delay in submitting a medical claim.
"A bare perusal of the instructions reveals that even those claims, which are submitted after 12 months, can be considered by the Health Department at the level of the Secretary of Administrative Department. The present claim for reimbursement was submitted after about one year by the petitioner," observed the bench.
Accordingly, the bench quashed the orders passed by the District Elementary Education Officer and the Block Education Officer and directed to forward the petitioner's claim, along with documents "put up in the year 2013" before the concerned Secretary, who was, in turn, directed to consider the claim before passing a speaking order within 60 days.
"It is needless to emphasise that if the claim is found to be genuine, the due amount of reimbursement shall be paid to the petitioner within 30 days, failing which the due amount shall carry interest at the rate of 18 per cent per annum for the period thereafter," the bench concluded.
Also Read: Medical Reimbursement to patients Valid Even for Treatment at Unapproved Hospitals in Emergency: HC
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.