SEC Asks Abbott to Submit More Data on Vitamin C Plus D3 FDC Chewable Tablet, Cites Lack of Justification

Written By :  Dr. Divya Colin
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2025-06-14 12:49 GMT   |   Update On 2025-06-14 12:49 GMT

New Delhi: In response to the proposal presented by Abbott, the Subject Expert Committee (SEC) functional under the Central Drug Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) has opined that the firm did not present adequate justification/rationale of the Vitamin C plus Vitamin D3 chewable tablet as a drug and its significant benefits among other observations.

In addition, the committee recommended the firm to submit the adequate data mentioned by the firm.

This came after the firm presented the proposal before the committee.

Vitamin C (also known as ascorbic acid and ascorbate) is a water-soluble vitamin found in citrus and other fruits, berries and vegetables. It is also a generic prescription medication and in some countries is sold as a non-prescription dietary supplement. As a therapy, it is used to prevent and treat scurvy, a disease caused by vitamin C deficiency.

Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) is in a class of medications called vitamin D analogs. Cholecalciferol is needed by the body for healthy bones, muscles, nerves, and to support the immune system. It works by helping the body to use more of the calcium found in foods or supplements.

At the recent SEC meeting for Antimicrobial and Antiviral held on 14th May 2025, the expert panel reviewed the proposal presented by the firm.

After detailed deliberation, the committee opined the following:

1. The firm did not present adequate justification/rationale for the proposed FDC as a drug and its significant benefits

2. Published scientific literature in peer reviewed journal in support of essentiality and desirability of proposed FDC is not presented.

3. Firm was not able to present justification on selection of strength of Vitamin D3 in the proposed FDC

4. The proposed FDC is not approved internationally

5. The firm did not present Published scientific literature of FDC for proposed indication.

Accordingly, the expert panel recommended that the firm should submit above data/documents for further review by the committee.

Also Read: Intas Gets CDSCO Panel Nod to Conduct Phase III Trial of Pertuzumab Biosimilar for Breast Cancer

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News