Revise Phase II/III CT protocol of Yellow Fever Vaccine Live: CDSCO Panel Tells Serum Institute of India

Published On 2023-03-04 12:30 GMT   |   Update On 2024-02-13 19:03 GMT
Advertisement

New Delhi: Reviewing the proposal presented by the vaccine maker Serum Institute of India to conduct Phase II/III clinical trial of Yellow Fever Vaccine, the Subject Expert Committee (SEC) functional under the Central Drug Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) has opined the firm to revise the Phase II/III clinical trial protocol.

This came after firm presented its proposal for grant of permission to conduct Phase II/III clinical trial of Yellow Fever Vaccine (Live) (I.P.) in ≥ 9 months to <18 years of age group along with Phase I clinical trial report.

Advertisement

Yellow fever is an acute viral haemorrhagic disease transmitted by infected mosquitoes. The "yellow" in the name refers to the jaundice that affects some patients. Symptoms of yellow fever include fever, headache, jaundice, muscle pain, nausea, vomiting and fatigue. A small proportion of patients who contract the virus develop severe symptoms and approximately half of those die within 7 to 10 days.

Yellow Fever Vaccine (Live) is a live-attenuated vaccine. This means that the vaccine uses a weakened, or attenuated, form of the yellow fever virus. As this type of vaccine is so similar to the natural infection, the body can create a strong and long-lasting immune response from just one dose without the need for a booster shot.

At the recent SEC meeting for Vaccines, the expert panel reviewed the Phase-I clinical trial report and recommended that the firm should submit detailed data on protocol deviations which should include:

1) No of subjects visited in each study visit in compliance with protocol.

2) Immunization data on Day 28

3) Details of visits and safety follow-up for each subject.

4) Details of each deviation and its evaluation with justification.

Furthermore, in response to the Phase II/III clinical trial protocol presented by the vaccine maker Serum Institute of India, the committee after detailed deliberation recommended that the firm should revise the Phase II/III clinical trial protocol as below:

1) Phase II and Phase III design should be separated in the protocol with a clear objectives & distribution of subjects in both phases.
2) The safety (solicited adverse events reported) should be assessed for all the subjects enrolled in the clinical trial with diary cards.
3) The number of subjects should be increased with a statistically significant sample size.
4) The clinical trial should be stratified and required to be conducted in adult subjects followed by a trial in a pediatric population specifying age group cohorts.
Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News