Roche loses bid to block Sandoz generic lung-disease drug

Andrews ruled for Sandoz on Tuesday and found Sandoz's label only encouraged non-infringing uses of the drug.

Published On 2022-03-26 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2022-03-26 03:30 GMT

New Delhi: Sandoz Inc has persuaded a Delaware federal judge to throw out a lawsuit that claimed its proposed generic version of a blockbuster lung-disease drug would violate the patent rights of the drug's original maker, Roche's Genentech Inc.

U.S. District Judge Richard Andrews on Tuesday rejected Genentech's infringement claims and found that parts of the Genentech patents were invalid.

Genentech's Esbriet is used to treat idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a serious chronic lung disease with no cure. Roche earned over $1 billion last year from worldwide Esbriet sales.

San Francisco-based Genentech sued Switzerland-based Sandoz and several other drugmakers, including Amneal Pharmaceuticals Inc and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, for patent infringement in 2019 over their proposed generic versions of Esbriet.

Read also: Roche India Atezolizumab marketing approval to be revoked for two indications: CDSCO panel

Genentech's patents cover methods of using Esbriet to treat IPF, and Genentech said the label of Sandoz's generic would encourage doctors to prescribe it in a way that infringes.

Andrews ruled for Sandoz on Tuesday and found Sandoz's label only encouraged non-infringing uses of the drug.

Sandoz's label included some infringing uses as "options, not recommendations," Andrews said.

Read also: Novartis Sandoz unit may be a tough pill for buyers to swallow: Bloomberg

Andrews also said that parts of some of the patents were invalid based on earlier publications that, taken together, made Genentech's innovations obvious. 

Genentech and its attorneys declined to comment. Sandoz and its attorneys did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 

Read also: Roche Pharma, Delhi State Cancer Institute collaborate to ensure quality cancer treatment

The case is Genentech Inc v. Sandoz Inc, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, No. 1:19-cv-00078. 

For Genentech: Mark Waddell and Alexandra Cavazos of Loeb & Loeb 

For Sandoz: Emily Rapalino of Goodwin Procter 

Read also: Sandoz unveils generic oncology medicine Lenalidomide in Europe 

Tags:    
Article Source : Reuters

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News