Long-acting progestogens as effective as oral contraceptive pills for preventing endometriosis-related pain recurrence: BMJ

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-06-21 16:00 GMT   |   Update On 2024-06-21 16:00 GMT
Advertisement

UK: A groundbreaking clinical trial known as PRE-EMPT, a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, randomized controlled trial, has yielded compelling evidence regarding managing endometriosis-related pain. The study, comparing the efficacy of long-acting progestogens to the combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP), offers valuable insights into optimizing treatment strategies for this debilitating condition affecting millions of women worldwide.

Advertisement

The study showed that postoperative prescription of a long-acting progestogen or the combined oral contraceptive pill led to similar levels of improvement in endometriosis-related pain at three years; both groups showed around a 40% improvement compared with preoperative levels.

"While women can be reassured that both options are effective, the reduced risk of repeat surgery for hysterectomy and endometriosis might make long-acting reversible progestogens preferable for some," the researchers wrote in The BMJ. 

Endometriosis, a chronic gynecological disorder characterized by the growth of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus, often leads to debilitating pelvic pain and infertility. While various treatment options exist, including hormonal therapies like progestogens and COCP, their relative effectiveness in preventing the recurrence of endometriosis-related pain has remained a subject of debate.

Against the above background, Kevin G Cooper, professor, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK, and colleagues aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of long-acting progestogens with the combined oral contraceptive pill in preventing recurrence of endometriosis-related pain.

The study included 405 women of reproductive age undergoing conservative surgery for endometriosis across 34 UK hospitals. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to a long-acting progestogen (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system; n=205) or the combined oral contraceptive pill (n=200).

The primary outcome was pain measured three years after randomization through the pain domain of the Endometriosis Health Profile 30 (EHP-30) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes, which were evaluated at six months, one, two, and three years, included the four core and six modular domains of the EHP-30, and treatment failure (second-line medical treatment or further therapeutic surgery).

The following were the key findings of the study:

  • At three years, there was no difference in pain scores between the groups (adjusted mean difference −0.8), which had improved by around 40% in both groups compared with preoperative values (an average of 24 and 23 points for long-acting progestogen and combined oral contraceptive pill groups, respectively).
  • Most of the other domains of the EHP-30 also showed improvement at all time points compared with preoperative scores without evidence of any differences between groups.
  • Women randomized to a long-acting progestogen underwent fewer surgical procedures or second-line treatments compared with those randomized to the combined oral contraceptive pill group (73 versus 97; hazard ratio 0.67).

The findings suggest that long-acting progestogens are as effective as COCP in preventing the recurrence of endometriosis-related pain after surgery and may be associated with a reduced need for further procedures.

Reference:

Cooper KG, Bhattacharya S, Daniels JP, Horne AW, Clark TJ, Saridogan E, Cheed V, Pirie D, Melyda M, Monahan M, Roberts TE, Cox E, Stubbs C, Middleton LJ; PRE-EMPT Collaborative Group. Long acting progestogens versus combined oral contraceptive pill for preventing recurrence of endometriosis related pain: the PRE-EMPT pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2024 May 15;385:e079006. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-079006. PMID: 38749550; PMCID: PMC11094611.


Tags:    
Article Source : The BMJ

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News