MRI-guided stereotactic body radiation reduces additional toxicity in prostate cancer: ASCO

Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-03-28 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2022-03-28 03:31 GMT
Advertisement

Los Angeles, CA: A new study demonstrated that MRI-guided prostate stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) results in a statistically significant decrease in acute grade 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity compared to CT-guided prostate SBRT. Patient-reported urine and bowel function measures are similarly better preserved with MRI guidance at the 1-month time point, albeit this difference fades (perhaps due to side-effect management) by the 3-month time point. The findings of this study were presented as posters in the 2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.

Advertisement

In the context of SBRT for intact prostate cancer, MRI guidance has significant theoretical benefits over CT guidance. The findings of an interim analysis of the phase III MIRAGE study, which is directly comparable to MRI- and CT-guidance with a pragmatic main endpoint of acute grade 2 GU toxicity, are presented here by Amar Upadhyaya Kishan and team.

MIRAGE is a randomized phase 3 experiment conducted at a single center. Men having SBRT for localized prostate cancer were randomized at random to either CT or MRI guidance. Around the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles, planning margins of 4 mm (CT-arm) and 2 mm (MRI-arm) were established, and this volume received 40 Gy in five portions. Elective nodal radiation and rectal spacers were permitted at the discretion of the physician. The primary outcome was the occurrence of grade 2 GU physician-reported toxicity within 90 days of SBRT (by CTCAE version 4.03). The incidence of acute grade 2 GU physician-reported toxicity, changes in EPIC-26 bowel domain summary scores at 1 and 3 months, and changes in IPSS scores at 1 and 3 months, were also secondary outcomes of interest.

The key findings of this study are as follow:

1. On September 1, 2021, 100 patients became eligible for the interim analysis (51 CT arm, 49 MRI arm).

2. In men who had MRI-guided SBRT, acute grade 2 GU toxicity was dramatically decreased. Acute grade 2 GI toxicity was also decreased considerably in males who had MRI-guided SBRT.

3. The rise in IPSS scores from baseline was considerably larger in males undergoing CT-guided SBRT at 1 month but not at 3 months.

4. The decrease in EPIC-26 bowel domain scores was considerably larger at 1 month, but not at 3 months, in males undergoing CT-guided SBRT.

5. Because of the high primary endpoint signal seen, our methodology was modified to lower the expected sample size to 154 while preserving 89% power to detect a difference.

In conclusion, the findings of this study show when MRI was used instead of CT to guide stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer, there was a significant reduction in bowel and urine side effects.

Reference:

Ma TM, Lamb JM, Casado M, Wang X, Basehart TV, Yang Y, Low D, Sheng K, Agazaryan N, Nickols NG, Cao M, Steinberg ML, Kishan AU. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (mirage): a phase iii randomized trial. BMC Cancer. 2021 May 11;21(1):538. doi:10.1186/s12885-021-08281-x. PMID: 33975579; PMCID: PMC8114498.

Tags:    
Article Source : American Society of Clinical Oncology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News