Red Cell Distribution Width is a strong predictor for Multiple Myeloma

Written By :  Dr.Niharika Harsha B
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-07-24 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2022-07-24 14:31 GMT
Advertisement

Red cell distribution width is a strong predictor of newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM). The study was published in the journal BMC Cancer, 2022.  

Multiple Myeloma is a hematologic malignancy characterized by abnormal clonal plasma cells that affects multiple organs in the body. Anemia, bone diseases, and kidney injury are some of the clinical features of the disease. Even though red cell distribution width (RDW) is a prognostic marker in many diseases like solid tumors, and hematologic neoplasms, its prognostic importance in MM is controversial. Hence, researchers from China conducted a study to understand the relationship between RDW and the clinical prognosis of MM patients through a Systematic meta-analysis.  

Advertisement

By using keywords and following the PRISMA guidelines they extracted data from search engines like PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Relevant parameters were extracted and combined for statistical analysis. The effect sizes were presented as hazard ratio (HR)/odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). HR/OR > 1 in MM patients with high RDW suggested a worse prognosis. Heterogeneity test evaluation was performed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. 

Results: 

  • 8 articles involving 9 studies with 1165 patients were included in the meta-analysis.
  • Elevated RDW was significantly associated with poor prognosis in MM.
  • A significant correlation was not found between RDW and International Staging System (ISS) staging. 

 Thus, the researchers concluded that in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients red cell distribution width was a strong predictor of the disease. 

To read the full article, click here: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09902-9 

Chen, X., Liu, J., Duan, J. et al. Is RDW a clinically relevant prognostic factor for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 22, 796 (2022). 

Tags:    
Article Source : BMC Cancer

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News