Arthroscopic modified Brostrom procedure superior to open procedure for treatment of ATFL injury: study

Written By :  Dr Supreeth D R
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-03-28 15:30 GMT   |   Update On 2024-03-29 07:33 GMT
Advertisement

LiLi Yang et al conducted a study to observe the clinical efficacy and safety of arthroscopic-modified Brostrom surgery for the treatment of anterior talofibular ligament injury (ATFL).

The clinical data of 51 cases with anterior talofibular ligament injury were retrospectively analyzed, in which 23 patients were treated by arthroscopic-modified Broström surgery (arthroscopic surgery group) and 28 patients were treated by open-modified Broström surgery (open surgery group). The time to surgery, hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) scores of ankle pain, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle and hindfoot scores, and incidence rate of complications were compared between the two groups.

Advertisement

The Key findings of the study were:

(1) General results: compared with open surgery group, arthroscopic surgery group had shorter time to surgery and hospital stay ((33.8 ± 6.7) min, (42.1 ± 8.5) min; (2.2 ± 1.4) d, (5.8 ± 1.6) d).

(2) VAS scores of ankle pain: there was an interaction effect between the time and group factors (F = 0.378, P = 0.018); overall, there was no statistically significant difference in VAS scores of ankle pain between the two groups, i.e., there was no grouping effect (F = 1.865, P = 0.163); there was statistically significant difference in VAS score of ankle pain at different time points before and after operation, i.e., there was a time effect (F = 1.675, P = 0.000); the VAS scores of ankle pain showed a decreasing trend with time in both groups, but the decreasing trend was not completely consistent between the two groups ((7.78 ± 1.23), (1.23 ± 1.24), (1.03 ± 0.35), (1.01 ± 0.28), F = 0.568, P = 0.000. (7.45 ± 1.43), (1.45 ± 1.87), (1.23 ± 0.55), (1.04 ± 0.37), F = 1.358, P = 0.000); there was no statistically significant difference in VAS score of ankle joint pain between the two groups six and 12 months before and after surgery (t = 2.987, P = 0.055; t = 1.654, P = 2.542; t = 0.015, P = 0.078); the VAS scores of ankle pain in the arthroscopic surgery group was lower than that in the open surgery group three months after operation (t = 1.267, P = 0.023).

(3) AOFAS ankle and hindfoot scores: there was an interaction effect between time and grouping factors (F = 2.693, P = 0.027); overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the AOFAS ankle and hindfoot scores between the two groups, i.e., there was no grouping effect (F = 1.983, P = 0.106); there was statistically significant difference in the AOFAS ankle and hindfoot scores at different time points before and after surgery, i.e., there was a time effect (F = 34.623, P = 0.000); the AOFAS ankle and hindfoot scores of the two groups showed an increasing trend with time, but the increasing trend of the two groups was not completely consistent ((48.19 ± 12.89), (89.20 ± 8.96), (90.24 ± 7.89), (91.34 ± 9.67), F = 25.623, P = 0.000; (49.35 ± 13.28), (86.78 ± 12.34), (88.78 ± 9.78),(91.43 ± 7.98), F = 33.275, P = 0.000); there was no statistically significant difference in the AOFAS ankle and hindfoot scores between the two groups 12 months before/ after surgery (t = 2.145,P = 0.056;t = 2.879,P = 0.389); compared with open surgery group, the arthroscopic surgery group had higher AOFAS ankle and hindfoot scores 3/6 months after surgery (t = 1.346, P = 0.014; t = 1.874, P = 0.028).

The authors concluded “for the treatment of anterior talofibular ligament injury, arthroscopic surgery group is superior to open surgery group in ankle pain relief and functional recovery and has shorter operation time and hospital stay compared with open surgery group.” 

Further reading:

Comparative clinical study of the modified Broström procedure for the treatment of the anterior talofibular ligament injury—outcomes of the open technique compared to the arthroscopic procedure LiLi Yang et al International Orthopaedics (2024) 48:409–417 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05963-y

Tags:    
Article Source : International Orthopaedics

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News