The environmental footprint of healthcare has become a growing concern, but the specific resource consumption associated with spine surgery remains largely unexplored. Despite the widespread use of continuous saline irrigation in endoscopic spine surgery, no study has previously compared the volume of saline consumption across different surgical techniques.
Xavier Castel et al conducted a study to compare saline consumption across three surgical techniques for lumbar disc herniation: classical microdiscectomy (MD), uniportal endoscopy (FE), and biportal endoscopy (UBE). The article has been published in “European Spine Journal.”
This was an international multicenter retrospective study conducted in France, Italy, and Switzerland. It included 722 patients who underwent lumbar disc herniation surgery. Patients were grouped based on the surgical technique used: MD (n = 127), FE (n = 253), and UBE (n = 342). The primary outcome was total saline consumption (Liters). Data collected included also demographic information and surgical duration. Statistical analyses included Kruskal-Wallis tests, pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction, ROC curve analysis, and a fixed-effects model to assess factors influencing saline consumption.
The key findings were:
• Saline consumption varied significantly across techniques, with a median (IQR) of 0.08 L (0.02–0.15) for MD, 4.00 L (3.00–6.00) for FE, and 9.00 L (6.00–13.00) for UBE (p < 0.0001) FE technique consume approximately 50 times more saline than MD, and UBE consume more than 112 times more saline than MD.
• No significant correlation was found between saline consumption and patient age or BMI.
The authors concluded – “Endoscopic techniques for lumbar disc herniation require substantially more saline than classical MD. This highlights the need for strategies promoting responsible resource stewardship in spine surgery. Future innovations, such as closed-loop fluid management systems, may help optimize both environmental sustainability and economic efficiency.”
Further reading:
Comparison of saline consumption between microdiscectomy, uniportal, and biportal endoscopic lumbar disc surgery: A multicenter observational study
Xavier Castel et al
European Spine Journal (2025) 34:5757–5764
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09256-3
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.