Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) frequently involves multiple levels of the spine. Whether to perform single-level decompression (SLD) or multi-level decompression (MLD) in patients with at least one borderline stenotic level adjacent to the primary (index) level, remains debated. Short-term follow-up studies show comparable outcomes for both strategies.
Erland Hermansen et al conducted a study to assess five-year outcomes in patients with adjacent borderline stenosis. The article has been published in ‘European Spine Journal.’
All participants were recruited from the NORDSTEN-SST. Patients with a preoperative adjacent borderline stenosis, defined as Schizas grade B or C, in addition to the index level, were included in the study. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the type of surgical intervention: SLD or MLD. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were recorded for both groups, with follow-up conducted five years postoperatively. Subgroup analysis based on the Schizas grade in the adjacent level were also performed.
The key findings of the study were:
• Out of 437 patients in the NORDSTEN-SST, the 222 with borderline adjacent stenosis were included. Among these, 114 underwent SLD, while 108 underwent MLD.
• In the MLD group 100 patients were operated in two levels, and 8 patients underwent three level surgery.
• The Dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA) in the index level was similar in the SLD group vs. the MLD group,
• Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Mean change in ODI-score was − 16.0 (95% CI -18.9—12.9) for the SLD group and − 18.6 (95% CI -22.1—15.1) for the MLD group, p = 0.26.
• Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences between groups in clinical outcomes or need for subsequent spinal surgeries.
The authors concluded – “In this observational study, five-year clinical outcomes in patients operated for lumbar spinal stenosis with a significant stenotic index level were not influenced by additional decompression of preoperative adjacent borderline stenotic levels.”
Further reading:
No long term benefit of decompression of a borderline lumbar spinal stenosis level adjacent to a more stenotic index level Erland Hermansen et al European Spine Journal (2025) 34:5715–5724 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09113-3
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.