Trigger finger, a common condition caused by flexor tendon compression in adults, often requires surgical release when conservative treatment fails. Oğuzhan Gökalp et al retrospectively compared the outcomes and costs of percutaneous needle release and traditional open release to treat trigger fingers.
A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing trigger finger surgery was conducted (n = 92). The patients were divided into two groups: open surgery (n = 43) and percutaneous release (n = 49). Treatment outcomes were assessed using the Gilbert questionnaire (failure, complications, and satisfaction), and functional outcomes were measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. The cost analysis was based on social security billing.
The key findings of the study were:
• The mean quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand scores are 10 ± 5.7 for the percutaneous group and 10.4 ± 5.7 for the open surgery group (p = 0.69).
• Finger stiff ness was reported in 2% of the percutaneous group and 30% of the open surgery group (p = 0.03), whereas scarring was observed in 0% of the percutaneous group and 23% of the open surgery group (p < 0.01).
• Returning to daily work was faster in the percutaneous group, with 67% resuming within a week compared to 0% in the open group (p < 0.01).
• The procedure costs averaged 156.3 ± 6.6 United States dollars for the percutaneous group and 182.9 ± 24.2 USD (United States dollars) for the open surgery group (p < 0.01).
The authors concluded – “This study demonstrated that both open and percutaneous surgical techniques are effective in treating trigger fingers. Percutaneous needle release appears to be a more cost-effective alternative to traditional open surgery for the trigger finger, with similar functional outcomes, faster recovery, fewer complications, and lower costs. However, open surgery remains a reliable, particularly in cases that require direct visualization, or in patients unsuitable for percutaneous techniques.”
Further reading:
Comparison of Open and Percutaneous Treatment in Trigger Finger: A Retrospective Analysis of Functional Results and Cost-Effectiveness
Oğuzhan Gökalp et al
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics (2025) 59:1530–1536
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01532-0
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.