Use of Bipolar Sealers and Tourniquet Have Similar Outcomes in TKA: Study

Written By :  Dr Supreeth D R
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-10-04 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2022-10-04 14:30 GMT

The use of tourniquets and bipolar sealers are effective methods of hemostasis during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, their effect on perioperative patient outcomes is unknown.Stephen G. Zak et al conducted a study to compare the efficacy of tourniquet-less, tourniquet-less with use of a bipolar sealer, and tourniquet use on postoperative pain and surgical outcomes following TKA....

Login or Register to read the full article

The use of tourniquets and bipolar sealers are effective methods of hemostasis during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, their effect on perioperative patient outcomes is unknown.

Stephen G. Zak et al conducted a study to compare the efficacy of tourniquet-less, tourniquet-less with use of a bipolar sealer, and tourniquet use on postoperative pain and surgical outcomes following TKA. The article has been published in Indian journal of orthopedics.

The authors found that both bipolar sealer and tourniquet use in TKA are associated with similar postoperative pain levels and length of stay (LOS) in comparison to tourniquet-less only TKA. However, bipolar sealer and tourniquet use may lead to better longer term improvement such as greater patient-reported outcome (PRO) score improvement and fewer readmissions.

A retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 120 primary TKA cases was conducted at an urban academic hospital. Primary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS) scores and opioid consumption (in morphine milligram equivalents). Demographics, length of stay (LOS), perioperative complications, and change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (ΔKOOS) were also collected. Patients were divided into cohorts based on the use of tourniquet-less with bipolar sealer (TRLB) (n=40), tourniquet (TR) (n=40), or tourniquet-less (TRL) (n=40).

The observations of the study were:

• There were no differences in demographic data between each cohort.

• TRLB, TR and TRL had similar LOS (2.68±1.63 vs 2.29±1.27 vs 2.36±1.42 days; p=0.472) and VAS pain score on postoperative day 1 (4.68 vs 3.74 vs 3.63; p=0.209).

• There were no differences in opioid consumption at 2 weeks (p=0.903), 1 month (p=0.973), 3 months (p=0.983), or 5 months (p=0.983) post-operatively.

• TRLB and TR had comparable improvement in ΔKOOS from baseline to 12 weeks post-operatively (Δ16.58±8.47 vs Δ23.92±14.60; p=0.254). Compared to the ΔKOOS of TRL (Δ5.19±2.59), TRLB and TR had clinically and statistically greater ΔKOOS improvements (p=0.009; p=0.001).

• The TRL cohort also had a higher readmission rate than TRLB and TR (15% vs 0% vs 5%, p=0.025).

The authors commented "In addition to maintaining hemostasis, blood loss reduction devices seem to provide intraoperative and perioperative benefits that may greatly assist surgeons in improving outcomes and recovery."

Further reading:

Bipolar Sealers and Tourniquet Use Have Similar Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Stephen G. Zak, Nishanth Muthusamy et al

Indian Journal of Orthopaedics (2022) 56:1745–1750

https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-022-00670-z

Tags:    
Article Source : Indian Journal of Orthopaedics

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News