Puducherry: Anaesthetist directed to pay 15 lakh compensation
An anaesthetist working in a private nursing home in Puducherry has been directed to pay a compensation of Rs 15 lakh for an alleged case of medical negligence. The decision has been taken by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Puducherry.
The anaesthetist has been directed to pay the amount to the family members of a person who died in 2002.
In this particular case, the deceased (patient) Kanniakumar was to undergo a gall bladder stone removal surgery at the nursing home. The operation was to be completed in a one hour time; however, the family was informed that the patient has developed complications because of a cardiac arrest. Later, things became really suspicious to the family, when the cardiologist arrived on the scene, and informed the family that the patient has passed away long time back.
What followed was a complaint filed by the bereaved family members alleging medical negligence by the private nursing home. It was only during the legal proceeding, the anaesthetist was implicated in the case, after conclusive sequence of events was drawn at the time of surgery.
As reported by Hindu on the details of the case:
The Commission comprising of its president Justice K.Venkataraman, members- K.K.Ritha and S.Tirougnanassambane passed the order on an appeal filed by the bereaved family seeking to order compensation.
Kanniakumar was advised by the specialist to undergo surgery to remove stone from the gallbladder. The surgery was fixed on July 27, 2002.
At 1.00 p.m, the specialist and the anaesthetist were present at the operation theatre.
At 3.00 p.m., the patient's relatives were informed that the operation would be completed in an hour.
After some time, they stated that the operation could not be continued because the patient had complicated cardiac problem.
A cardiologist who was called in, declared that the patient had died long back. The relatives of staged a protest and a case was registered.
Complaint filed
The family members filed a complaint before District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Puducherry for compensation from the nursing home, the specialist and anesthetist. The District Forum dismissed the complaint. Hence, the family members filed an appeal before the commission.
Holding that the managing director of private nursing home was not liable to pay any compensation, the commission pointed out that he had only leased out the second floor of complex to the urology clinic.
The commission said that the patient had collapsed even before the specialist began his work and therefore he was left off.
In the judgement, Ms. Ritha noted, “A simple surgery had turned out to be fatal for a patient who had no health problems as per his medical records. Simple anaesthetic procedure turned out to be complicated due to the lackadaisical attitude of the anaesthetist. We have observed that two failed intubations, hypoxia and also plenty of medicines were pumped into the body of patient. When everything failed, tracheotomy was also done. Finally, it was beyond the control of the concerned doctor to save the life. Thus, the lapse on the part of anaesthetist amounts to medical negligence.”
The anaesthetist has been directed to pay the amount to the family members of a person who died in 2002.
In this particular case, the deceased (patient) Kanniakumar was to undergo a gall bladder stone removal surgery at the nursing home. The operation was to be completed in a one hour time; however, the family was informed that the patient has developed complications because of a cardiac arrest. Later, things became really suspicious to the family, when the cardiologist arrived on the scene, and informed the family that the patient has passed away long time back.
What followed was a complaint filed by the bereaved family members alleging medical negligence by the private nursing home. It was only during the legal proceeding, the anaesthetist was implicated in the case, after conclusive sequence of events was drawn at the time of surgery.
As reported by Hindu on the details of the case:
The Commission comprising of its president Justice K.Venkataraman, members- K.K.Ritha and S.Tirougnanassambane passed the order on an appeal filed by the bereaved family seeking to order compensation.
Kanniakumar was advised by the specialist to undergo surgery to remove stone from the gallbladder. The surgery was fixed on July 27, 2002.
At 1.00 p.m, the specialist and the anaesthetist were present at the operation theatre.
At 3.00 p.m., the patient's relatives were informed that the operation would be completed in an hour.
After some time, they stated that the operation could not be continued because the patient had complicated cardiac problem.
A cardiologist who was called in, declared that the patient had died long back. The relatives of staged a protest and a case was registered.
Complaint filed
The family members filed a complaint before District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Puducherry for compensation from the nursing home, the specialist and anesthetist. The District Forum dismissed the complaint. Hence, the family members filed an appeal before the commission.
Holding that the managing director of private nursing home was not liable to pay any compensation, the commission pointed out that he had only leased out the second floor of complex to the urology clinic.
The commission said that the patient had collapsed even before the specialist began his work and therefore he was left off.
In the judgement, Ms. Ritha noted, “A simple surgery had turned out to be fatal for a patient who had no health problems as per his medical records. Simple anaesthetic procedure turned out to be complicated due to the lackadaisical attitude of the anaesthetist. We have observed that two failed intubations, hypoxia and also plenty of medicines were pumped into the body of patient. When everything failed, tracheotomy was also done. Finally, it was beyond the control of the concerned doctor to save the life. Thus, the lapse on the part of anaesthetist amounts to medical negligence.”
Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.