Researchers have found in a new study that maternal RSVpreF vaccination was associated with significant protection against RSV-related acute respiratory infections (ARI) and lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) hospitalizations in infants aged 90 days or younger. These early real-world findings provide clinical evidence that maternal vaccination can help prevent RSV-associated hospitalizations during early infancy. Continued data collection and follow-up are needed to further refine vaccine effectiveness estimates. The study was published in JAMA Network Open by Anne-Mark R. and colleagues.

To conduct a proper evaluation of the actual protective effect provided by the maternal vaccination strategy, researchers designed a carefully controlled case-control study in one healthcare organization located in western Pennsylvania. The clinical chart review included the information collected from two sequential post-approval RSV seasons, both 2023–2024 and 2024–2025 cycles. Study participants were infants no older than 90 days old born within certain seasonal blocks, particularly between October 1, 2023, and April 15, 2024, or between September 1, 2024, and April 30, 2025, and admitted to hospitals for the treatment of ARIs.

In order to select cases and controls, test-negative design was used, meaning that infants were regarded as cases if they had received positive results of RSV molecular nucleic acid amplification and/or rapid antigen tests; otherwise, infants were considered controls. The strict eligibility criteria for maternal exposure to RSVpreF vaccine included vaccination between 32 weeks 0 days and 36 weeks 6 days gestation at least two weeks before delivery. Logistic regression was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios for estimating vaccine effectiveness.

Key findings:

  • The multi-season test-negative design yielded successful evaluation of a total sample of 274 infants admitted to the hospital, including 83 RSV-positive infants and 191 RSV-negative infants.
  • The analyzed infants' age upon admission to the hospital was 29.5 ± 21.1 days, while the gender distribution of the studied infants was balanced with 143 male infants (52.2%).
  • Among the studied samples, 13.3% of RSV-positive infants (11 out of 83 infants) were born of women who had received the vaccine, while 37.2% of the healthy infants (71 out of 191 infants) had been vaccinated as fetuses.
  • The estimated vaccine effectiveness calculated using the adjusted regression models resulted in exactly 67.6% (95% CI, 33.2%–85.4%) against RSV-associated ARI hospitalizations between 0 and 90 days of life.
  • In addition, the maternal vaccine showed secondary effectiveness rate against severe RSV-associated LRTD hospitalizations from birth up to 90 days of age with 69.0% (95% CI, 25.5%–88.0%) of protection.
  • The highest vaccine effectiveness of 74.2% (95% CI, 25.4%–93.0%) was observed against RSV-associated ARI hospitalizations among very vulnerable infants aged from 0 to 30 days.

In summary, RSVpreF maternal vaccination was linked to the prevention of RSV-related ARI and LRTD hospitalizations among infants 90 days old or less. In sum, the results obtained here represent preliminary clinical proof of the efficacy of RSVpreF maternal vaccinations to prevent hospitalization related to RSV infections in infants. As such, this post-licensure research constitutes crucial empirical evidence in modern preventative pediatric care, illustrating how preemptive maternal healthcare translates to significant infant disease reduction.

Reference:

Rick A, Deese J, Kerr JE, et al. Maternal Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Vaccination and Acute Respiratory Illness in Infants. JAMA Netw Open. 2026;9(6):e2616773. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.16773


Tags:    
Article Source : JAMA Network Open

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .