PET imaging reliable for evaluating new cancer therapies: Study
USA: According to a recent study in the Journal of Nuclear Medicine, FAPi PET imaging of cancer patients with a gallium-68 (Ga-68) tracer may be a reliable way for evaluating new therapies.
According to results from the interim analysis of a prospective exploratory imaging trial, 68Ga-FAPi-46 PET biodistribution across multiple cancers strongly correlated with fibroblast activation protein (FAP) tissue expression. The findings support further investigation of FAPi PET as a pan-cancer imaging biomarker for FAP expression and stratification tool for FAP-targeted therapies.
FAP-expressing cancer-associated fibroblasts are known to promote metastasis and immunosuppression and confer treatment resistance. Radiolabeled molecules targeting FAP are being used as pan-cancer theranostic agents because FAP is overexpressed in many cancers.
Christine E. Mona, University of California Los Angeles, United States, and colleagues aimed to establish the spectrum of FAP expression across various cancers by immunohistochemistry and to explore whether gallium-68 FAPi-46 (68Ga-FAPi-46) PET biodistribution faithfully reflects FAP expression from resected cancer and non-cancer specimens.
For this purpose, the researchers conducted a FAP expression screening by using immunohistochemistry on a pan-cancer human tissue microarray (TMA) (141 patients, 14 different types of cancer) and an interim analysis of a prospective exploratory imaging trial in cancer patients.
Volunteer patients underwent one whole body 68Ga-FAPi-46 PET/CT scan and subsequently, surgical resection of their primary tumor and/or metastasis. 68Ga-FAPi-46 PET maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVmean) was correlated with FAP immunohistochemistry score in cancer and non-cancer tissues for each patient.
Key findings include:
- FAP was expressed across all 14 cancers types on TMA with variable intensity and frequency, ranging from 25 to 100%.
- Strong FAP expression was observed in 50-100% of cancers of the bile duct, bladder, colon, esophagus, stomach, lung, oropharynx, ovary and pancreas.
- Fifteen patients with various cancer types (colorectal (n = 4), head and neck (n = 3), pancreas (n = 2), breast (n = 2), stomach (n = 1), esophagus (n = 2) and uterus (n = 1)) underwent surgery following their 68Ga-FAPi-46 PET/CT scan within a mean time interval of 16.1±14.4 days.
- 68Ga-FAPi-46 SUVs and immunohistochemistry scores were higher in cancer than in normal tissue: mean SUVmax 7.7 vs 1.6, mean SUVmean 6.2 vs 1.0 and mean FAP immunohistochemistry score 2.8 vs 0.9.
- FAP immunohistochemistry scores strongly correlated with 68Ga-FAPi 46 SUVmax and SUVmean: r=0.781 and r=0.783, respectively.
"These findings support further exploration of FAPi PET as a pan-cancer imaging biomarker for FAP expression and stratification tool for FAP- targeted therapies," the authors concluded.
Reference:
Correlation of 68Ga-FAPi-46 PET biodistribution with FAP expression by immunohistochemistry in patients with solid cancers: a prospective translational exploratory study. Christine E. Mona, Matthias R. Benz, Firas Hikmat, Tristan R. Grogan, Katharina Lückerath, Aria Razmaria, Rana Riahi, Roger Slavik, Mark D. Girgis, Giuseppe Carlucci, Kimberly A. Kelly, Samuel W French, Johannes Czernin, David W. Dawson, Jeremie Calais. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Nov 2021, jnumed.121.262426; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262426
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.