Vancomycin Addition to Cefazolin Shows No Superiority in Preventing Surgical-Site Infections in Arthroplasty

Written By :  Dr Riya Dave
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-10-20 03:45 GMT   |   Update On 2023-10-21 06:40 GMT

In a recent multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, researchers investigated the addition of vancomycin to beta-lactam prophylaxis in arthroplasty procedures. The study's primary conclusion is that the addition of vancomycin to cefazolin prophylaxis does not demonstrate superiority over a placebo in preventing surgical-site infections in arthroplasty procedures among patients...

Login or Register to read the full article

In a recent multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, researchers investigated the addition of vancomycin to beta-lactam prophylaxis in arthroplasty procedures. The study's primary conclusion is that the addition of vancomycin to cefazolin prophylaxis does not demonstrate superiority over a placebo in preventing surgical-site infections in arthroplasty procedures among patients without known MRSA colonization.

This study was published in The New England Journal Of Medicine by Trisha Peel and colleagues. The study aimed to determine whether the addition of vancomycin, a potent antibiotic, to the standard cefazolin prophylaxis regimen would reduce the occurrence of surgical-site infections.

The study enrolled 4,239 adult patients who were undergoing arthroplasty procedures, including knee, hip, and shoulder arthroplasty. The patients did not have known methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization. They were randomly assigned to receive either 1.5 grams of vancomycin or a normal saline placebo in addition to cefazolin prophylaxis.

Key Findings:

  • Surgical-Site Infections: Among the 4,113 patients included in the modified intention-to-treat population, surgical-site infections occurred in 4.5% of the patients who received vancomycin and 3.5% of the patients who received the placebo. The relative risk was 1.28, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.94 to 1.73, suggesting no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.11).
  • Subgroup Analysis: When looking at specific arthroplasty procedures, it was observed that the addition of vancomycin was associated with a higher rate of surgical-site infections in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty (5.7% in the vancomycin group compared to 3.7% in the placebo group). However, there was no significant difference in the rates of surgical-site infections for patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.
  • Adverse Events: Adverse events occurred in 1.7% of patients in both the vancomycin and placebo groups. Notably, hypersensitivity reactions were more common in the vancomycin group (1.2% vs. 0.5% in the placebo group), with a relative risk of 2.20. On the other hand, acute kidney injury was less frequent in the vancomycin group (2.1% vs. 3.6% in the placebo group), with a relative risk of 0.57.

While the results showed a trend towards increased surgical-site infections in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty when vancomycin was used, this trend was not statistically significant. Additionally, the study highlighted the occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions and acute kidney injury in some patients receiving vancomycin.

These findings suggest that the routine addition of vancomycin to cefazolin prophylaxis in arthroplasty may not be necessary for patients without known MRSA colonization. However, further research may be needed to investigate the potential benefits in specific subgroups or in cases where MRSA colonization is present.

Reference:

Peel, T. N., Astbury, S., Cheng, A. C., Paterson, D. L., Buising, K. L., Spelman, T., Tran-Duy, A., Adie, S., Boyce, G., McDougall, C., Molnar, R., Mulford, J., Rehfisch, P., Solomon, M., Crawford, R., Harris-Brown, T., Roney, J., Wisniewski, J., & de Steiger, R. Trial of vancomycin and cefazolin as surgical prophylaxis in arthroplasty. The New England Journal of Medicine,2023;389(16):1488–1498. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2301401 

Tags:    
Article Source : The New England Journal Of Medicine

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News