Patient-reported passage of kidney stone may not have acceptable accuracy: Study
Written By : Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By : Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2020-09-16 00:42 GMT | Update On 2020-09-16 00:42 GMT
Advertisement
Canada: Patient-reported stone passage and resolution of pain does not guarantee that the stone has truly passed, suggests a recent study in the Journal of Urology.
Ryan McLarty, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, and colleagues assessed the accuracy of patient-reported outcomes for predicting spontaneous ureteral stone passage.
For the purpose, the researchers prospectively assessed patients with new unilateral ureteral calculi regarding current symptoms and whether they believed their stone had passed.
Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.