Short-Term Foley Catheters fail to Reduce chances of Urinary Retention after Primary THA and TKA

Written By :  Aditi
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-05-04 22:15 GMT   |   Update On 2023-05-05 08:42 GMT

Researchers from Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, in their research article entitled "Short-Term Indwelling Foley Catheters Do Not Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Urinary Retention in Uncomplicated Primary THA and TKA” published in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery demonstrated whether a short-term Foley catheter (inserted in the operating room and removed upon...

Login or Register to read the full article

Researchers from Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, in their research article entitled "Short-Term Indwelling Foley Catheters Do Not Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Urinary Retention in Uncomplicated Primary THA and TKA” published in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery demonstrated whether a short-term Foley catheter (inserted in the operating room and removed upon arrival to the orthopaedic floor) would reduce the risk of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in patients undergoing total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). According to the study, utilizing a short-term Foley catheter during surgery and removal upon transfer to the orthopaedic floor does not lower the POUR rate.

228 TKA patients and 160 TKA patients were randomized to receive a short-term Foley catheter (143 male and 245 female). POUR was the primary outcome measured. UTI or urinary tract infections (within three weeks) and requirement of ≥1 straight catheterization. were secondary outcomes

The study results could be summarised as follows:

  • Nine patients developed POUR, four in the short-term Foley group and 5 in the control group, 2.1% versus 2.6%.
  • Males were more prone to develop POUR compared to females (88.9% versus 11.1%)
  • 10 in the Foley group and 14 in the control group, 5.2% versus 7.2%, required ≥1 straight catheterization
  • 3 in the Foley group and 1 in the control group, 1.5% versus 0.5% developed UTIs on intention-to-treat analysis
  • Four in the Foley group and none in the control group developed UTIs (2.1% versus 0.0%) on as-treated analysis.

Concluding further, they wrote that using a short-term Foley catheter inserted in the operating room and removed on arrival to the orthopaedic floor does not decrease the rate of POUR.

Further reading:

Weintraub, Matthew T. BS1; Yang, JaeWon MD1; Nam, Denis MD, MSc1,a; Greenspoon, Joshua A. MD1; DeBenedetti, Anne MSc1; Karas, Vasili MD, MS1; Mehta, Neal MD2; Della Valle, Craig J. MD1. Short-Term Indwelling Foley Catheters Do Not Reduce the Risk of Postoperative Urinary Retention in Uncomplicated Primary THA and TKA: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 105(4):p 312-319, February 15, 2023. | DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00759


Tags:    
Article Source : The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News