- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Use of Enhanced Radiation Protection Does Not Delay PCI in STEMI: Study

USA: A study from a single experienced center found that using an enhanced radiation protection system (Rampart M1128; Rampart IC) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI patients does not delay treatment compared with standard lead aprons.
Median door-to-balloon (D2B) time was virtually identical between the groups, with 31.0 minutes for the Rampart system and 31.1 minutes for lead aprons. After adjustment for clinical variables, the difference of 1.51 minutes was not statistically significant, indicating that improved operator radiation safety can be achieved without compromising procedural timeliness.
Prolonged radiation exposure is a well-recognized occupational hazard for catheterization laboratory staff, and traditional lead aprons, while protective, contribute to musculoskeletal injuries over time. The Rampart M1128 system is designed to enhance radiation protection while reducing physical strain on operators, but its effect on D2B times during urgent STEMI interventions had not been previously assessed. This study aimed to fill that knowledge gap.
The research, published in the Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, included 174 STEMI patients undergoing PCI at Ascension St. Vincent Heart Center, Indianapolis. Patients were equally divided between those treated using standard lead aprons and those using the Rampart system. The cohort was randomly selected from a pool of 298 patients, and analyses accounted for potential confounders, including bleeding, vasopressor use, intubation, mechanical circulatory support, electrical instability, vascular access type, and prior revascularization.
The study revealed the following findings:
- Unadjusted median door-to-balloon (D2B) time was 31.0 minutes for the Rampart system and 31.1 minutes for the lead apron group.
- Adjusted analysis confirmed noninferiority, with a mean difference of 1.51 minutes, well within the prespecified 5-minute margin.
- No significant differences in D2B times were observed between the two groups.
- The presence of shock or respiratory failure did not prolong D2B times in patients using the Rampart system.
- The Rampart system can be safely used without delaying PCI, even in critically ill STEMI patients.
The authors acknowledge limitations, including the single-center, retrospective design and modest sample size, which may limit detection of small differences or rare high-risk cases like cardiogenic shock requiring large-bore access. High procedural volume and operator experience likely minimized the learning curve, so smaller or lower-volume centers might see slightly longer adjustments.
Despite these limitations, the study provides encouraging evidence that enhanced radiation protection systems can be implemented without delaying life-saving PCI in STEMI patients. “Our results demonstrate that investing in operator safety with modern radiation protection does not compromise the timeliness of care,” the authors concluded. They emphasize that wider adoption of such systems may reduce occupational hazards for catheterization laboratory staff while maintaining high-quality cardiovascular outcomes.
Overall, the study supports the integration of advanced radiation protection tools like Rampart M1128 into high-volume cath labs, offering improved staff safety without adversely affecting D2B times, a critical determinant of survival in STEMI patients. Further studies in larger, multi-center settings are warranted to confirm these findings and explore their applicability across different practice environments.
Reference:
Hallak, O., Mehringer, M., Alkowatli, H., Lowery, J. W., & Hermiller, J. B. (2025). Impact of a Novel Radiation Protection System on Door-to-Balloon Time During STEMI Intervention. Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 104108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2025.104108
Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsSTEMI InterventionDoor-to-Balloon TimeRadiation Protection System
Source : Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsDr Kamal Kant Kohli-MBBS, DTCD- a chest specialist with more than 30 years of practice and a flair for writing clinical articles, Dr Kamal Kant Kohli joined Medical Dialogues as a Chief Editor of Medical News. Besides writing articles, as an editor, he proofreads and verifies all the medical content published on Medical Dialogues including those coming from journals, studies,medical conferences,guidelines etc. Email: drkohli@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751
Next Story

