- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Lower and higher IV Fluid volumes have equal mortality and adverse events in sepsis patients
Denmark: A new research found that in adult patients with sepsis, the type of fluid volumes do not have any benefit or damage as Lower IV fluid volumes are likely to have barely any effect in all-cause mortality and serious adverse events when compared to higher IV fluid volumes. The study was published in the Chest Journal.
Intravenous (IV) fluids are essential for the management of sepsis, but current guidelines are backed by evidence of extremely low certainty. As there are conflicting results on the effect of lower and higher fluid volumes on patient-reported outcomes of sepsis management, researchers conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to provide a summary of the available evidence on patient-important outcomes of lower vs higher IV fluid volumes in adult patients with sepsis.
Researchers conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials assessing lower vs higher IV fluid volumes in adult patients with sepsis. The co-primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The study was carried out following the recommendations by the Cochrane Handbook and using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach (GRADE). Primary conclusions were based on low risk of bias (RoB) trials if available.
Key findings: No significant
- 13 trials were included (n=4006) with four additional trials (n=3385) added to this update.
- The meta-analysis of all-cause mortality in eight low RoB trials showed a relative risk (RR) of 0.99 (97% CI 0.89 to 1.10; moderate certainty evidence).
- Six trials with predefined definitions of SAEs showed a RR of 0.95 (97% CI 0.83 to 1.07; low certainty evidence).
- HRQoL was not reported.
Take-home points:
Lower IV fluid levels in adult patients with sepsis are likely to result in little to no change in all-cause mortality compared to greater IV fluid volumes, but the conclusion is hampered by imprecision in the estimate, which does not rule out either benefit or damage.
Similarly, data show that decreased IV fluid amounts have little to no effect on major adverse outcomes. There were no HRQoL trials reported.
Further reading: Sivapalan P, Ellekjaer KL, Jessen MK, et al. Lower vs Higher Fluid Volumes in Adult Patients with Sepsis - An Updated Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis [published online ahead of print, 2023 May 2]. Chest. 2023;S0012-3692(23)00637-2. doi 10.1016/j.chest.2023.04.036
BDS, MDS
Dr.Niharika Harsha B (BDS,MDS) completed her BDS from Govt Dental College, Hyderabad and MDS from Dr.NTR University of health sciences(Now Kaloji Rao University). She has 4 years of private dental practice and worked for 2 years as Consultant Oral Radiologist at a Dental Imaging Centre in Hyderabad. She worked as Research Assistant and scientific writer in the development of Oral Anti cancer screening device with her seniors. She has a deep intriguing wish in writing highly engaging, captivating and informative medical content for a wider audience. She can be contacted at editorial@medicaldialogues.in.
Dr Kamal Kant Kohli-MBBS, DTCD- a chest specialist with more than 30 years of practice and a flair for writing clinical articles, Dr Kamal Kant Kohli joined Medical Dialogues as a Chief Editor of Medical News. Besides writing articles, as an editor, he proofreads and verifies all the medical content published on Medical Dialogues including those coming from journals, studies,medical conferences,guidelines etc. Email: drkohli@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751