- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Pay Fine of Rs 5 lakh to PGIMER: Consumer Court tells Insurance company
Chandigarh: Taking stringent action against an insurance company for repudiating a claim of a patient just because he had pre-existing condition of Hyperntesion, District Consumer disputes redressal forum recently directed the company to pay a compensation of Rs 2.46 lakh.
Further in a one of its kind move, the forum also directed Bajaj Allianz General Insurance to deposit a sum of Rs 5 lakh with Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) as "severe punishment" for repudiating the claim of an insured person on ground of pre-existing hypertension.
The money will go to the cardiology department and Advanced Cardiac Centre. The deposited amount will be used for the treatment of needy patients.
The case relates to Daljeet Singh Saini, a resident of sector 49. The complainant had bought a medical claim policy of Rs 10 lakh. However, the company refused to provide for cashless treatment for coronary angioplasty in December 2016.
The court clearly stated the apex court and the consumer commission, in many cases have repeatedly held that hypertension cannot be the criteria for rejecting a claim as it is not a material disease that is fatal in itself. However, the insurance company still denied the claim in violation of all the court judgements. As a result, the court decided to impose a penalty on the company
As reported by TOI, besides giving money to the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), the insurance company is liable to pay the patient Rs 2.46 lakh with 12% interest along with Rs 5,000 as the cost of litigation.
Also Read: Insurance Cos Cannot deny claim to LAMA Patients: HC
Medical Dialogues Bureau consists of a team of passionate medical/scientific writers, led by doctors and healthcare researchers. Our team efforts to bring you updated and timely news about the important happenings of the medical and healthcare sector. Our editorial team can be reached at editorial@medicaldialogues.in.