- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Sulopenem not as effective as ertapenen for treating complicated UTIs, pyelonephritis: Study
USA: A new study found that for treating complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), sulopenem followed by oral sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid seemed non-inferior to ertapenem followed by oral step-down therapy. Findings published in Clinical Infectious Diseases showed both formulations of sulopenem to be well-tolerated.
Sulopenem is a thiopenem antibiotic that is being developed for treating multidrug-resistant infections. The accessibility of both oral and intravenous (IV) formulations will ease the early discharge of hospitalized patients.
The study included hospitalized patients with bacteriuria, pyuria, and signs and symptoms of complicated UTI. They were randomized to receive five days of IV sulopenem followed by oral sulopenem etzadroxil/probenecid or five days of IV ertapenem followed by oral ciprofloxacin or amoxicillin-clavulanate. The randomization was dependent on baseline uropathogen susceptibility. The primary endpoint was the overall combined microbiological and clinical response at the Test of Cure visit on the 21st day.
The study led to the following findings:
- Of 1392 treated patients, 444 and 440 were respectively treated with sulopenem, and ertapenem had a positive urine culture at baseline and were suitable for the primary efficacy analyses.
- The researchers identified organisms producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) in 26.6% of patients and fluoroquinolone non-susceptible pathogens in 38.6%.
- Noninferiority of sulopenem to the comparator regimen was not shown for the primary endpoint, 67.8% vs. 73.9% (difference, -6.1%). The difference was driven by the lower rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria in the subgroup of ertapenem-treated patients who stepped down to oral ciprofloxacin.
- The researchers did not observe a substantial difference in overall response at any other timepoint. The IV and oral sulopenem formulations were well-tolerated and compared favorably to the comparator regimen.
"We found that Sulopenem followed by oral sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid for not non-inferior than ertapenem followed by oral step-down therapy for treating complicated UTI, driven by a reduced rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria in patients who received ciprofloxacin," the researchers wrote. "Both sulopenem formulations were well-tolerated."
Reference:
Michael W Dunne, Steven I Aronin, Anita F Das, Karthik Akinapelli, Jeanne Breen, Michael T Zelasky, Sailaja Puttagunta, Sulopenem For The Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection Including Pyelonephritis: A Phase 3 Randomized Trial, Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2022;, ciac704, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac704
MSc. Biotechnology
Medha Baranwal joined Medical Dialogues as an Editor in 2018 for Speciality Medical Dialogues. She covers several medical specialties including Cardiac Sciences, Dentistry, Diabetes and Endo, Diagnostics, ENT, Gastroenterology, Neurosciences, and Radiology. She has completed her Bachelors in Biomedical Sciences from DU and then pursued Masters in Biotechnology from Amity University. She has a working experience of 5 years in the field of medical research writing, scientific writing, content writing, and content management. She can be contacted at editorial@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751
Dr Kamal Kant Kohli-MBBS, DTCD- a chest specialist with more than 30 years of practice and a flair for writing clinical articles, Dr Kamal Kant Kohli joined Medical Dialogues as a Chief Editor of Medical News. Besides writing articles, as an editor, he proofreads and verifies all the medical content published on Medical Dialogues including those coming from journals, studies,medical conferences,guidelines etc. Email: drkohli@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751