- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
NEET 2025: HC junks candidate's re-examination plea alleging mismanagement

Patna High Court
Patna: The Patna High Court has refused to entertain a plea that sought re-examination of the National Eligibility Entrance Test Undergraduate (NEET UG) 2025 at an exam cenntre alleging mismanagement and delay in the distribution of question papers and answer sheets to the candidates.
While considering the plea filed by a NEET UG candidate in this regard, the HC Single Judge bench of Patna High Court, comprising Justice Harish Kumar, dismissed the plea.
"In view of the submissions advanced by the learned Advocate for the respondents NTA as well as NMC, besides the specific contention denying any mismanagement and defiance of any terms and conditions in holding the examination, this Court does not find any reason or occasion to continue with the present writ petition...Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed, sans any merit," the HC bench observed.
The grievance of the petitioner was limited to the extent that in the Centre in question, where he had appeared as a candidate of the NEET UG 2025 examination held on 04.05.2025, on account of mismanagement and delay in the distribution of question papers and answer sheets to the appearing candidates.
It was alleged that the petitioner, along with others, had not been allowed to utilize the complete three hours, and almost 30-35 minutes of the examination stood wasted, causing serious prejudice and suffering. Based on these grounds, the petitioner prayed for a re-test of the NEET UG Examination in the said Centre.
NTA, in its counter-affidavit, submitted that the Principal of the Utkramit Uchch Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Kurthaul, Centre No. 1502107, Centre Name Bapu Pariksha Parisar, Kumhrar, Patna, who was the Centre Superintendent, along with the Invigilator of the afore-noted Centre, have categorically stated in their respective response that no candidate, including the petitioner, raised any complaint regarding the conduct of the examination or shortfall of time. The examination was duly commenced at 2:00 pm sharp and continued without interruption till 5:00 pm and all the candidates have been extended a complete three hours' time. It has further been disclosed that after completion of the examination, all the OMR answer sheets were duly collected from the candidates and placed in the pink envelope, sealed in the presence of two candidates from the room, who also acted as witnesses and put their signature. The counter affidavit categorically stated that regarding strict compliance with the NTA’s prescribed procedure and no mismanagement has been found in the Centre in question.
The Court noted that even though the counter affidavit was filed on 23.09.2025, no denial of the averments. Considering the submissions advanced by the counsel for NTA as well as NMC, besides the specific contention denying any mismanagement and defiance of any terms and conditions in holding the examination, the HC bench denied to entertain the plea.
To view the HC order, click on the link below:
https://medicaldialogues.in/pdf_upload/patna-hc-321511.pdf
Also Read: NEET 2025: NTA Declares Results for power outage affected MP Candidates
M.A in English Barsha completed her Master's in English from the University of Burdwan, West Bengal in 2018. Having a knack for Journalism she joined Medical Dialogues back in 2020. She mainly covers news about medico legal cases, NMC/DCI updates, medical education issues including the latest updates about medical and dental colleges in India. She can be contacted at editorial@medicaldialogues.in.

