- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Appointment of Additional Professor in Pediatric Surgery challenged in High Court
Cuttack: On the basis of a petition questioning the legality of the appointment and possible promotion of an additional Professor in Pediatric Surgery in All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, the Orissa High Court has issued notice to the Central Government in this regard.
On Friday, the High Court vacation bench comprising of Chief Justice Dr. S. Muralidhar and Justice Savitri Rao has sent notice to the AIIMS, Deputy Director of AIIMS and the Professor in question as well.
The Counsel for Centre has accepted the notice and has stated to file a reply within six weeks. The Court, on the other hand, has asked the Professor in question to file a reply within four weeks.
This comes after, the petitioner, who is a retired Director of the Steel Authority of India filed the petition last month, five years after the questioned appointment, on the basis of procured information by one of his close friends under the Right to Information Act.
The petitioner has not only questioned the appointment of the said doctor back in April 2016, but has also expressed apprehension regarding the further promotion of the additional Professor as a Professor.
It has been submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the promotion in question has been put on hold due to the ongoing Covid-19 situation. He also placed reliance upon a series of decisions of the Supreme Court including The University of Mysore v. C.D. Govinda Rao, N. Kannadasan v. Ajoy Khose and Central Electricity Supply Utility of Odisha v. Dhobei Sahoo.
Issuing notice to the concerned people and authorities, the HC bench asked the counsel for the petitioner to file rejoinder, if any, before the next date of hearing.
Posting the matter to be next heard on September 6, 2021, the High Court vacation bench clarified that all the steps taken by the Centre and AIIMS in the matter of promotion of the concerned additional Professor "will be subject to the outcome of the writ petition."
To view the original court order, click on the link below.
https://medicaldialogues.in/pdf_upload/orissa-high-court-155607.pdf
Barsha completed her Master's in English from the University of Burdwan, West Bengal in 2018. Having a knack for Journalism she joined Medical Dialogues back in 2020. She mainly covers news about medico legal cases, NMC/DCI updates, medical education issues including the latest updates about medical and dental colleges in India. She can be contacted at editorial@medicaldialogues.in.