- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Hospitals cannot refuse or delay treatment of road accident victims: Allahabad HC

Lucknow: Hospitals and doctors cannot refuse or delay treatment to someone injured in a road accident on the ground that medico-legal formalities or police procedures have not been completed, the Allahabad High Court said on Friday.
A Lucknow bench of Justices Rajan Roy and Manjive Shukla passed the order on a public interest litigation filed by Anju Prakash Srivastava in 2000.
The court directed the Uttar Pradesh government to file its counter-affidavit within 10 days, detailing the steps taken to ensure compliance with the Supreme Court’s directions and the guidelines issued by the Centre regarding treatment of road accident victims, according to PTI.
The bench expressed displeasure that the state had failed to file its counter-affidavit for more than 25 years. It hence directed the state to pay Rs 25,000 as costs to the petitioner, who has been pursuing the litigation since 2000. The matter will next be heard on October 1.
Also Read:45 year old doctor dies after unidentified vehicle hits motorcycle in MP
The court said that every doctor has a professional obligation to protect human life and provide immediate medical care to an injured person, irrespective of whether the person was at fault in the accident.
The bench further said that procedural requirements cannot come in the way of this paramount obligation.
The PIL was filed in 2000 and included a photograph of a prominent hospital in Lucknow. The photograph showed a notice displayed on the hospital facade stating that medico-legal cases, including burn and accident cases, were not treated there.
The petitioner had relied on the photograph to highlight alleged non-compliance with the Supreme Court’s directions.
During the hearing, the state referred to the Supreme Court’s 2016 judgment in Savelife Foundation and the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways on May 12, 2015, for protection of good samaritans.
The guidelines state that failure by a doctor to respond in an emergency arising from a road accident, where the doctor is expected to provide care, may constitute professional misconduct and disciplinary action can be taken against the doctor, reports PTI.
The guidelines also require hospitals to display a charter at their entrances, in Hindi, English and the local language, stating that a bystander or good samaritan who brings an injured person to the hospital should not be detained or asked to deposit money for the victim’s treatment. The guidelines are applicable to both public and private hospitals.
The High Court further directed the state government to disclose in its affidavit the mechanism in place to monitor compliance with these directions, details of inspections of hospitals, the system for receiving and redressing complaints regarding violations, and, as far as possible, district-wise details of complaints received.
Also Read:Doctor couple injured after car crashes into guardrail on Mumbai-Ahmedabad Highway
Kajal Rajput joined Medical Dialogues as an Correspondent for the Latest Health News Section in 2019. She holds a Bachelor's degree in Arts from University of Delhi. She manly covers all the updates in health news, hospitals, doctors news, government policies and Health Ministry. She can be contacted at editorial@medicaldialogues.in Contact no. 011-43720751

