- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
US Wholesaler Files Class Action Against Novo Nordisk Over Diabetes Drug Victoza Monopoly Claims

Smith Drug asked the court for an unspecified amount of monetary damages on behalf of a proposed class of Victoza purchasers.
New Delhi: Danish pharmaceutical giant Novo Nordisk was hit with a class action lawsuit in New York federal court on Friday for allegedly misusing its patents to maintain a monopoly on its diabetes drug Victoza.
The complaint from South Carolina-based drug wholesaler Smith Drug accused Novo of using a "pay-for-delay" scheme with generic drugmaker Teva Pharmaceutical to illegally delay cheaper generic versions of the drug.
A Novo spokesperson declined to comment on the complaint. A spokesperson and attorneys for Smith Drug did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Spokespeople for Teva, which is not a defendant in the lawsuit, also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Victoza, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2010, was Novo's first-generation blockbuster GLP-1 drug. The lawsuit said that Novo sold more than $5 billion worth of the drug in the United States in 2018, though its sales have since decreased.
Novo's second-generation GLP-1 drug Ozempic has helped make the company the most valuable in Europe.
Teva launched the first generic version of Victoza in 2024. According to the complaint, Novo unlawfully paid to delay Teva's entry into the generic market as part of a 2019 settlement of patent litigation between the companies.
The lawsuit said that generic Victoza would have been on the market in 2023 without Novo and Teva's agreement. Smith Drug asked the court for an unspecified amount of monetary damages on behalf of a proposed class of Victoza purchasers.
The case is Smith Drug Co v. Novo Nordisk Inc, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, No. 1:26-cv-00420.
Sheeba Farhat Joined Medical Dialogues in 2018 to report on the latest Education news. A Graduate of the University of Delhi, she specializes in covering stories related to Medical Education updates. For inquiries or further information, you can reach her at editorial@medicaldialogues.in.

