- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Intrauterine device penetrates gastric wall: Case describes rare complication
The intrauterine device (IUD) is a widely used family planning method. The total inThe post Upadacitinib non-inferior to adalimumab for psoriatic arthritis treatmecidence of uterine penetration caused by IUDs is 1.1/1000. In rare cases, IUDs can perforate the uterine wall into the abdominal cavity or even penetrate adjacent organs, causing symptoms similar to lesions of the lower digestive tract, urinary tract, or pelvic floor.
Zhao et al reported a novel case of an IUD penetrating the gastric wall with symptoms resembling a peptic ulcer, requiring a laparoscopic partial gastric resection in Contraception Journal.
The patient, a 31-year-old gravida 2 para 2 woman, presented with complaints of intermittent epigastric pain for 2 years. Eleven years prior, she underwent a "pi"-shaped copper bearing IUD placement 14 months after her first full-term delivery while still lactating; during and after the process, she denied severe or persistent pelvic pain or any other complaints.
One month after placement, her doctor performed an ultrasound examination during her well-women exam which demonstrated no IUD and a normal 2 weeks intrauterine pregnancy; the doctor diagnosed IUD expulsion.
She delivered vaginally at 41 weeks 3 days gestation and had another IUD of the same type placed postpartum.
Two years prior to the team's evaluation, she reported new onset epigastric pain and was treated with amoxicillin, omeprazole and metronidazole for presumed peptic ulcer complicated with Helicobacter pylori infection.
Six months prior, the patient again experienced severe pain in the left upper abdomen.
One month prior, a "pi"-shaped radio-opaque object in the upper abdomen was incidentally found by X-ray examination for a lumbar lesion and the patient was transferred to Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Bejing, China.
- Abdominal computed tomography showed the object penetrating the gastric wall .
- Gastroscopy revealed a local protuberance of the gastric wall at the same site.
- The findings represented a perforated and displaced IUD with gastric wall penetration.
The team performed a laparoscopic partial gastrectomy which included the IUD as suspected. Additionally, a weak area at the uterine fundus was found. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course.
"A known but rare complication of IUD placement includes uterine perforation and migration to adjacent organs like bladder, lower urinary tract, and rectum; however, penetration of the gastric wall and symptoms resembling a peptic ulcer have not yet been reported. The incidence of uterine perforation in lactating women within 36 weeks after delivery of 4.8/1000 is approximately 4-fold higher than the overall perforation risk, which may be related to low estrogen levels during the lactation period.
In this case, the originally suspected uterine expulsion was actually a uterine perforation. Although IUDs have been reported in the upper abdomen following perforation, it was suspected that the elevation of the uterine fundus during the ensuing pregnancy may have also elevated the perforated IUD to the upper abdomen.
Notably, the patient lacked any symptoms for many years, which implies that gastric wall penetration occurred gradually over time. It is possible that the unique structure of this IUD may have contributed to penetration of the gastric wall, causing symptoms resembling a peptic ulcer.
In this case, the initial assumption of expulsion was never fully evaluated to exclude perforation. Even if radiological examination is not suitable during pregnancy, abdominal ultrasound can be an appropriate choice and abdominal X- ray can be performed after delivery. A completed evaluation after delivery in this patient may have allowed for simple laparoscopic retrieval years earlier and avoided the need for partial gastrectomy."
Source: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.01.006 0010-7824/© 2021
MBBS, MD Obstetrics and Gynecology
Dr Nirali Kapoor has completed her MBBS from GMC Jamnagar and MD Obstetrics and Gynecology from AIIMS Rishikesh. She underwent training in trauma/emergency medicine non academic residency in AIIMS Delhi for an year after her MBBS. Post her MD, she has joined in a Multispeciality hospital in Amritsar. She is actively involved in cases concerning fetal medicine, infertility and minimal invasive procedures as well as research activities involved around the fields of interest.
Dr Kamal Kant Kohli-MBBS, DTCD- a chest specialist with more than 30 years of practice and a flair for writing clinical articles, Dr Kamal Kant Kohli joined Medical Dialogues as a Chief Editor of Medical News. Besides writing articles, as an editor, he proofreads and verifies all the medical content published on Medical Dialogues including those coming from journals, studies,medical conferences,guidelines etc. Email: drkohli@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751