- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Unrecognized Glove Perforation May Raise Infection Risk After Cesarean, reveals study

A recent prospective cohort study published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth has highlighted the potential risk of unrecognized glove perforations during cesarean sections, which may contribute to the rising incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs). The study involved the examination of 1,779 pairs of surgical gloves used in 593 cesarean operations. While macro-perforations were observed in 9.4% of cases, micro-perforations were identified in 5.4% of gloves that appeared intact during visual inspection. The researchers employed a water-fill test to detect these micro-perforations, which were not visible to the naked eye. The findings revealed that 21.8% of patients whose surgical gloves had micro-perforations developed SSIs, compared to only 2.2% in the control group with intact gloves. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that micro-perforation was a significant independent predictor of SSI, with an adjusted odds ratio of 12.705 (95% CI: 4.244–38.039; p < 0.001), even after adjusting for potential confounders such as diabetes, obesity, emergency cesarean, operative duration, and intraoperative blood loss. The study underscores the importance of recognizing glove integrity as a critical factor in preventing SSIs. The authors suggest that unrecognized glove perforation should be considered a risk factor for SSI after cesarean section and recommend implementing preventive measures, such as routine use of double-gloving and regular glove integrity checks, especially during high-risk procedures. These findings call for heightened awareness and adherence to aseptic techniques to mitigate the risk of postoperative infections in cesarean deliveries.
Keywords: glove perforation, cesarean section, surgical site infection, micro-perforation, aseptic technique, double-gloving, infection prevention
Dr. Shravani Dali has completed her BDS from Pravara institute of medical sciences, loni. Following which she extensively worked in the healthcare sector for 2+ years. She has been actively involved in writing blogs in field of health and wellness. Currently she is pursuing her Masters of public health-health administration from Tata institute of social sciences. She can be contacted at editorial@medicaldialogues.in.