- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
HPV Vaccination May Allow Much Less Frequent Cervical Cancer Screening: Study

A modeling analysis based on Norway’s vaccination experience suggests that women vaccinated against HPV before age 24 could safely and cost-effectively extend cervical cancer screening intervals to every 15–25 years, potentially limiting screening to just two or three times in a lifetime. However, the findings may not fully generalize to countries with more variable vaccination uptake and screening practices. The study was published in the Annals of Internal Medicine journal by Kine P. and colleagues.
The HPV vaccine significantly reduces the lifetime risk of persistent infection with high-risk HPV, precancerous lesions, and cervical cancer. However, many screening programs were developed for women who had not received the vaccine and may now result in over-screening, colposcopies, and patient burden in vaccinated women. In this new environment, where the risks and benefits of screening are being reevaluated, there is a need to reassess the age at which screening should begin, the frequency of screening, and the number of lifetime screens.
This trial employed an individual-based mathematical model design, based on published data, to assess the cervical cancer screening approach in modelled populations of women in Norway. The women were assumed to have been administered either the bivalent or nonavalent HPV vaccine at one of seven age groups:
Age 12
Ages 13-15
Ages 16-18
Ages 19-21
Ages 22-24
Ages 25-27
Ages 28-30
The model was run over a lifetime time horizon, with the analysis performed from an extended health care sector perspective.
Key findings
Cost-effectiveness was evaluated using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.
A screening strategy was deemed more desirable if it cost less than a threshold value of $55,000 per QALY.
The ratio of colposcopy referrals to cervical cancer averted was used to quantify harm-benefit trade-offs.
The results show that the preferred screening strategies for all vaccination ages were those with longer screening cycles.
Women who received vaccinations between the ages 12-24 years would benefit from screening cycles of 15-25 years.
The optimal lifetime screening frequency for these groups was 2-3 times.
This modeling analysis demonstrates that a high-value cervical cancer screening strategy for women who have been vaccinated against HPV includes much less frequent screening, especially for those who were vaccinated by age 30 years. Tailoring screening approaches based on the age at vaccination and the type of vaccine used could help maintain the benefits of cancer prevention while minimizing the risks and expenses, which represents a significant milestone in the direction of more personalized and effective preventive medicine.
Reference:
Pedersen, K., Di Silvestre, J., Sy, S., Portnoy, A., Castle, P. E., Kim, J. J., & Burger, E. A. (2026). Optimizing cervical cancer screening by age at vaccination for human Papillomavirus: Health and resource implications. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-25-03192
Dr Riya Dave has completed dentistry from Gujarat University in 2022. She is a dentist and accomplished medical and scientific writer known for her commitment to bridging the gap between clinical expertise and accessible healthcare information. She has been actively involved in writing blogs related to health and wellness.
Dr Kamal Kant Kohli-MBBS, DTCD- a chest specialist with more than 30 years of practice and a flair for writing clinical articles, Dr Kamal Kant Kohli joined Medical Dialogues as a Chief Editor of Medical News. Besides writing articles, as an editor, he proofreads and verifies all the medical content published on Medical Dialogues including those coming from journals, studies,medical conferences,guidelines etc. Email: drkohli@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751

