- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Rajasthan: 10 years jail for PC-PNDT violations from now on
Jaipur: Punishment for sex determination activities just got harder in the state. It is reported that state government has now started booking sex determination crimes under Section 315 of the IPC, which calls for upto 10 years jail or fine or both for violations. It is reported that the said section of the Indian Penal Code pertains to an Act done with intent to prevent child being born alive or to cause it to die after birth and thus calls for higher punishment than the provisions of the PC-PNDT Act.
In particular, Section 315 of the Indian Penal Code specifies
This is contrast to the PC-PNDT ACT, violations under which call for imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees and on any subsequent conviction, with imprisonment which may extend to five years and with fine which may extend to fifty thousand rupees.
It is reported that the authorities have already started bringing harsher punishments to effect, by lodging several cases under this section, in order to demoralize the practice of sex determination..
Medical Dialogues had earlier reported about a decoy operation by PCPNDT cell of Rajasthan, where a doctor from Himmatnagar in Gujarat was arrested.  TOI reports The PCPNDT cell imposed Section 315 of IPC and arrested the accused and brought him to Rajasthan. Earlier to this, two cases were also registered in a similar fashion after decoy operations in Haryana and Uttar Pradesh
This comes after expert legal advice, as the state appropriate authority (PCPNDT) Navin Jain has directed his officials to arrest the accused under Section 315 of IPC
The move brings a clear advantage to the authorities in terms of their mandates of operations .A PCPNDT cell official informed TOIÂ that in order to conduct decoy operations for arresting accused in other states, they need to take the other state's appropriate authority (PCPNDT) in confidence. Every state has its own PCPNDT cell. But, under Section 315 of IPC, they have the power to arrest the accused from all other states, except for Jammu and Kashmir. Rajasthan's PCPNDT cell started imposing Section 315 of IPC in October last year. Till date, it has imposed the section in eight cases.
Also , it has been further pointed out that the accused can get a bail when sections of PCPNDT Act are imposed but when Section 315 of IPC is imposed, it is difficult to get bail.
It is further added that the Rajasthan health department have appointed ACPÂ Raghuveer Singh as thw new head of the PCPNDT cell, who has conducted three decoy operations outside the state in UP, Haryana and Gujarat.
In particular, Section 315 of the Indian Penal Code specifies
 Act done with intent to prevent child being born alive or to cause it to die after birth.—Whoever before the birth of any child does any act with the intention of thereby preventing that child from being born alive or causing it to die after its birth, and does by such act prevent that child from being born alive, or causes it to die after its birth, shall, if such act be not caused in good faith for the purpose of saving the life of the mother, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, or with fine, or with both.
This is contrast to the PC-PNDT ACT, violations under which call for imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees and on any subsequent conviction, with imprisonment which may extend to five years and with fine which may extend to fifty thousand rupees.
It is reported that the authorities have already started bringing harsher punishments to effect, by lodging several cases under this section, in order to demoralize the practice of sex determination..
Medical Dialogues had earlier reported about a decoy operation by PCPNDT cell of Rajasthan, where a doctor from Himmatnagar in Gujarat was arrested.  TOI reports The PCPNDT cell imposed Section 315 of IPC and arrested the accused and brought him to Rajasthan. Earlier to this, two cases were also registered in a similar fashion after decoy operations in Haryana and Uttar Pradesh
This comes after expert legal advice, as the state appropriate authority (PCPNDT) Navin Jain has directed his officials to arrest the accused under Section 315 of IPC
The move brings a clear advantage to the authorities in terms of their mandates of operations .A PCPNDT cell official informed TOIÂ that in order to conduct decoy operations for arresting accused in other states, they need to take the other state's appropriate authority (PCPNDT) in confidence. Every state has its own PCPNDT cell. But, under Section 315 of IPC, they have the power to arrest the accused from all other states, except for Jammu and Kashmir. Rajasthan's PCPNDT cell started imposing Section 315 of IPC in October last year. Till date, it has imposed the section in eight cases.
Also , it has been further pointed out that the accused can get a bail when sections of PCPNDT Act are imposed but when Section 315 of IPC is imposed, it is difficult to get bail.
It is further added that the Rajasthan health department have appointed ACPÂ Raghuveer Singh as thw new head of the PCPNDT cell, who has conducted three decoy operations outside the state in UP, Haryana and Gujarat.
Meghna A Singhania is the founder and Editor-in-Chief at Medical Dialogues. An Economics graduate from Delhi University and a post graduate from London School of Economics and Political Science, her key research interest lies in health economics, and policy making in health and medical sector in the country. She is a member of the Association of Healthcare Journalists. She can be contacted at meghna@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751
Next Story