Achieving very low LDL-C tied to lower risk of MI, stroke, and death with no safety concerns: FOURIER-OLE analysis

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-02-16 05:15 GMT   |   Update On 2023-02-16 07:26 GMT
Advertisement

USA: Long-term achievement of lower LDL-C levels, down to <20 mg/dL, is associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and no safety concerns in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, according to an analysis of FOURIER-OLE. The study appeared in the journal Circulation on Feb 13 2023.

LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) is a well-known risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, there is no information on the optimal achieved LDL-C level concerning safety and efficacy in the long term.

Advertisement

FOURIER (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk) comprised 27 564 patients with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. They were randomized to evolocumab or placebo and followed for a median of 2.2 years. In FOURIER-OLE, the open-label extension, 6635 patients transitioned to open-label evolocumab irrespective of initial treatment allocation in the parent trial and were followed for an additional five years.

Prakriti Gaba from Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston, MA, and colleagues examined the relationship between achieved LDL-C levels, defined as an average of the first two measured LDL-C levels, in FOURIER-OLE (in 6559 patients) and the incidence of subsequent CV and safety outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were also performed to evaluate cardiovascular and safety effects in the whole FOURIER-OLE and FOURIER patient population.

The study led to the following findings:

· In FOURIER-OLE, 40%, 24%, 16%, 12%, and 7% patients achieved LDL-cholesterol levels of 20 to <40, <20, 40 to <55, ≥70, and 55 to <70 mg/dL, respectively.

· The team observed a monotonic relationship between lower achieved LDL-C levels—down to very low levels <20 mg/dL—and a lower risk of the primary efficacy endpoint (composite of myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina or coronary revascularization) and the key secondary efficacy endpoint (composite of myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, or stroke) that persisted after multivariable adjustment.

· No statistically significant associations were found between lower achieved levels of LDL-C and increased risk of the safety outcomes (new or recurrent cancer, serious adverse events, hemorrhagic stroke, cataract-related adverse events, neurocognitive adverse events, new-onset diabetes, muscle-related events, or noncardiovascular death) in the primary analyses.

· Similar findings were seen in the whole FOURIER-OLE and FOURIER cohort up to a maximum follow-up of 8.6 years.

To conclude, long-term achievement of lower LDL-cholesterol levels down to <20 mg/dL was linked with a lower risk of CV outcomes and no notable safety concerns in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Reference:

Gaba P, O'Donoghue ML, Park JG, Wiviott SD, Atar D, Kuder JF, Im K, Murphy SA, De Ferrari GM, Gaciong ZA, Toth K, Gouni-Berthold I, Lopez-Miranda J, Schiele F, Mach F, Flores-Arredondo JH, López JAG, Elliott-Davey M, Wang B, Monsalvo ML, Abbasi S, Giugliano RP, Sabatine MS. Association Between Achieved Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels and Long-Term Cardiovascular and Safety Outcomes: An Analysis of FOURIER-OLE. Circulation. 2023 Feb 13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.063399. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36779348.

Tags:    
Article Source : Circulation

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News